Removable Fuselage Shield for Open Rotor Aircraft

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Aircraft fuselages with unducted rotor engines face challenges in protecting against rotor blade failure, as the open rotor configuration lacks a nacelle to contain debris, potentially causing damage and requiring a solution that balances safety with efficiency and maintainability.

Innovation Solution

A removably coupled fuselage shield with a layered structure, including an energy distribution layer, energy absorption layer, and load spreading layer, is positioned asymmetrically relative to the rotor blades to absorb and distribute impact forces, reducing the risk of fuselage damage while minimizing weight and drag.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a fuselage shield is installed to protect against rotor blade debris, then safety and structural integrity are improved, but weight and aerodynamic drag increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The fuselage shield is installed only at specific locations where rotor blade debris impact is most likely, rather than covering the entire fuselage. This localized protection approach provides necessary safety while minimizing the addition of weight and drag across the whole aircraft structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The shield employs a layered composite structure with an outer layer for debris impact resistance and an inner layer for structural support. This composite design achieves adequate protection with reduced material quantity compared to a solid shield, thereby limiting weight increase while maintaining safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If a fuselage shield is installed to protect against rotor blade debris, then safety and structural integrity are improved, but aerodynamic drag increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidaerodynamic drag
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The shield is positioned only in the specific region where debris impact risk is highest, reducing the total surface area exposed to airflow. This localized placement minimizes the disruption to airflow patterns and reduces aerodynamic drag while still providing necessary protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The shield features a curved, aerodynamic shape that allows airflow to follow its contour more smoothly rather than creating sharp disruptions. This curved design reduces flow separation and turbulence, thereby minimizing aerodynamic drag while maintaining protective function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Reliability

If a permanently attached fuselage shield is used, then protection reliability is improved, but ease of maintenance and adaptability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection reliabilityVSAvoidease of maintenance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The shield is designed with a dynamic attachment system that allows it to be easily installed and removed, transitioning between a fixed protective state during operation and a removable state for maintenance. This dynamic capability enables reliable protection during flight while facilitating easy maintenance and adaptation on the ground.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The shield is divided into modular segments that can be independently installed or removed, allowing maintenance personnel to access and service specific areas without removing the entire shield structure. This segmented design maintains protection reliability while significantly improving ease of maintenance and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Ease of manufacture

If a symmetric fuselage shield is used, then manufacturing simplicity is improved, but effectiveness in absorbing asymmetric impact forces deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoideffectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The shield is designed with an asymmetric configuration where the outer layer has different properties or thicknesses on different sides to match the asymmetric nature of rotor blade debris impact forces. This asymmetric design optimizes the distribution of impact forces across the shield structure, improving protective effectiveness while the modular construction keeps manufacturing complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The fuselage shield effectively protects the aircraft from rotor blade debris, maintaining structural integrity and reducing the risk of catastrophic damage while optimizing for aerodynamic efficiency and ease of maintenance.

Implementation Method 1

an energy distribution layer, energy absorption layer, and load spreading layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy distribution:

Implementation Method 2

an energy distribution layer, energy absorption layer, and load spreading layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy absorption: Damping

Implementation Method 3

an energy distribution layer, energy absorption layer, and load spreading layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLoad spreading: Stress Relaxation

Data Source

PatentUS12103702B2Removeable fuselage shield for an aircraft
Publication Date: 2024.10.01 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • US12103702B2 patent drawing
  • US12103702B2 patent drawing
  • US12103702B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An aircraft defining a longitudinal direction and a lateral direction is provided. The aircraft includes a fuselage; an engine mounted at a location spaced from the fuselage of the aircraft, the engine comprising rotor blades; and at least one fuselage shield removably coupled to the fuselage at a location in alignment with the rotor blades along the lateral direction.