Removable Stretcher Chute for Ambulance Loading

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing medical vehicles face difficulties in efficiently boarding stretchers due to limited space and the need for complex, expensive, and bulky devices that require permanent fixation and energy supply, which are not suitable for multi-functional vehicles like those in the military field.

Innovation Solution

A compact, removable, and lightweight chute device with a lateral arm and attachment points that can be securely fixed to the vehicle's external wall, allowing the chute to penetrate and position on internal stretcher holders without the need for internal fastening or ground stabilization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a motorized loading platform is permanently fixed to the vehicle floor, then stretcher boarding is facilitated, but the device becomes complex, expensive, and requires energy supply

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestretcher boardingVSAvoidloading platform structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The loading platform is divided into two independent parts: a fixed support structure attached to the vehicle and a removable chute assembly. This segmentation allows the chute to be easily detached and stored when not in use, eliminating the need for complex permanent installations while maintaining ease of operation during stretcher boarding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The device transitions from a static permanent platform to a dynamic removable system. The chute can be quickly deployed, positioned, and removed as needed, providing flexibility without requiring energy supply or complex mechanical systems. The lateral arm with attachment points enables rapid deployment and repositioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If a telescopic ramp is permanently fixed to the vehicle floor, then stretcher boarding is improved, but the device becomes bulky and cannot be used on multi-functional vehicles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestretcher boardingVSAvoidvehicle function compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

By separating the support (fixed to vehicle) from the chute (removable), the system becomes adaptable to different vehicle configurations. The chute can be stored in the passenger compartment when not needed, allowing the vehicle to switch between medical and other functions without permanent modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The removable chute can be discarded (removed from vehicle) when medical function is not required and recovered (reinstalled) when needed. This allows multi-functional vehicles like military transport vehicles to maintain stretcher boarding capability without permanent fixtures that would limit other uses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Stability of the object's composition

If a chute requires a folding external foot for ground stabilization, then the device becomes bulky and requires ground contact, but stretcher boarding stability is improved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechute stabilizationVSAvoiddevice size
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The ground stabilization function is extracted from the chute itself and transferred to the fixed support structure attached to the vehicle. The lateral arm with attachment points provides stable vehicle-side anchoring, eliminating the need for external ground-contacting feet and reducing device volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The fixed support structure acts as an intermediary between the vehicle and the chute, providing stable anchoring to the vehicle body. This mediator eliminates the need for the chute to directly contact and stabilize against the ground, reducing the chute's required size and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Device complexity

If the attachment point is positioned at the end of the chute, then the device becomes simpler, but the chute cannot effectively position on the internal stretcher holder

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment structureVSAvoidstretcher positioning
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The attachment point is strategically positioned at a specific location between the chute ends rather than at the extremity, creating a local quality that enables proper positioning. This specific placement allows the chute to correctly align with and position on the internal stretcher holder while maintaining relatively simple attachment structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP2620132B1Device to assist with loading a stretcher and ambulance provided with such a device
Publication Date: 2015.04.08 NEXTER SYST SA
  • EP2620132B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2620132B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2620132B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~5

AI summary

The device has a chute (12) comprising a side arm (13) that includes an attachment point (14) placed between ends (12a) of the chute. The attachment point is removably secured to an external wall of a medical vehicle (1) at a support (9). The support is fixed to the vehicle in the vicinity of an opening (4) of the vehicle. One of the ends is penetrated inside the vehicle for being positioned on an internal stretcher carrier (6) when the attachment point is fixed to the support. The attachment point is located at equal distance from the ends of the chute. An independent claim is also included for a medical vehicle.