Renewable Aviation Fuel Formulation via Biomass Fermentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current 100 octane aviation fuels face challenges in meeting ASTM specifications due to difficulties in controlling reaction extent and selectivity, leading to unreacted side products and inadequate energy content, while existing methods fail to provide a non-petroleum based alternative that meets Federal Aviation Administration standards.

Innovation Solution

A binary mixture of aromatic hydrocarbons and isoparaffins, specifically mesitylene and isopentane, derived from biomass through bacteriological fermentation, is formulated to meet the technical specifications for 100 octane aviation fuel, including high energy content and tailored physical properties for various engines.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If conventional methods are used to produce 100 octane aviation fuel, then motor octane number requirement is met, but energy content is insufficient and ASTM specifications are not satisfied

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy contentVSAvoidASTM specification compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical composition parameters by using specific ratios of high-energy components (至少60% by weight) combined with octane-enhancing components (至少20% by weight), thereby simultaneously improving energy content and achieving ASTM specification compliance including motor octane number of at least 100

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite fuel formulation by combining multiple components with different properties: high-energy components (such as hydrocarbons with specific carbon-hydrogen ratios) and octane-enhancing components (such as aromatic hydrocarbons or branched alkanes), where the synergistic effect achieves both high energy content and specification compliance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Productivity

If reaction extent and selectivity are not properly controlled, then production efficiency is maintained, but unreacted side products are generated and fuel quality is inadequate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidfuel composition control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements process control mechanisms that monitor reaction extent and selectivity, using feedback to adjust operating conditions (temperature, pressure, catalyst concentration) to maintain optimal conversion rates while minimizing unwanted side products, thereby ensuring both productivity and fuel quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses catalysts as intermediaries to control the reaction pathway, enhancing selectivity toward desired fuel components while maintaining high conversion rates, thus resolving the conflict between production efficiency and composition control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Quantity of substance

If tetraethyl lead is used to achieve 100 octane rating, then motor octane number requirement is met, but environmental compliance is compromised as EPA designates it as the last allowed fuel

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor octane numberVSAvoidenvironmental compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates the harmful tetraethyl lead component and replaces it with environmentally benign alternatives (aromatic hydrocarbons, branched alkanes, or oxygenates) that provide the same octane-enhancing effect without the toxic and environmental drawbacks, thereby converting a harmful solution into a beneficial one

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the persistent harmful substance (tetraethyl lead) with alternative components that can be more easily managed and do not accumulate environmental toxicity, effectively substituting a long-term harmful additive with shorter-term, more manageable alternatives

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The renewable fuel achieves high octane ratings, meeting or exceeding ASTM standards, and provides a non-petroleum based alternative with improved energy content and lubricity, suitable for replacing conventional 100 LL aviation fuel in aircraft and other heat engines.

Implementation Method 1

derived from biomass through bacteriological fermentation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFermentation: Fermentation

Implementation Method 2

suitable for replacing conventional 100 LL aviation fuel in aircraft and other heat engines

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Data Source

PatentUS9145566B2Renewable engine fuel and method of producing same
Publication Date: 2015.09.29 SWIFT ENTERPRISES LTD
  • US9145566B2 patent drawing
  • US9145566B2 patent drawing
  • US9145566B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides high-octane fuel, and a method of producing same. These fuels may be formulated to have a wide range of octane values and energy, and may effectively be used to replace 100 LL aviation fuel (known as AvGas), as well as high-octane, rocket, diesel, turbine engine fuels, as well as two-cycle, spark-ignited engine fuels.