Replaceable Surface Adsorption Rotor for Faster Maintenance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing adsorption rotors require full replacement when performance degrades, leading to high costs and material waste, especially in integral and divided types, and fixed-type dust-collectors result in clogging issues without effective desorption.

Innovation Solution

An adsorption rotor design allowing only the deteriorated surface side to be replaced, with a structure that enables easy detachment and attachment by modifying metal aggregates, maintaining the same outer diameter and promoting turbulent airflow for improved performance, reducing exchange time and cost.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If an integral-type adsorption rotor is used, then the initial manufacturing cost is comparatively cheap, but when performance deteriorates the entire rotor must be replaced resulting in excessive time and effort for exchange and increased replacement cost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinitial manufacturing costVSAvoidexchange time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The adsorption rotor is divided into a non-detachable base portion and a detachable surface side portion. The surface side portion can be removed and replaced independently without replacing the entire rotor, thus reducing exchange time and effort while maintaining reasonable initial manufacturing costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of manufacture

If an integral-type adsorption rotor is used, then the initial manufacturing cost is comparatively cheap, but heavy industrial equipment is needed during exchange resulting in increased replacement cost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinitial manufacturing costVSAvoidreplacement cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the rotor into detachable surface side portions, the replacement process becomes simpler and does not require heavy industrial equipment, thus reducing replacement cost while maintaining low initial manufacturing cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of repair

If a divided-type adsorption rotor is used, then sectors can be easily exchanged resulting in decreased exchange cost, but the initial cost is comparatively high due to strengthening every sector piece

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexchange costVSAvoidinitial cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The rotor is segmented into a non-detachable base portion and detachable surface side portions. This segmentation allows easy exchange of only the deteriorated surface portions without requiring strengthening of entire sector pieces, thus reducing initial cost while maintaining low exchange cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If a fixed-type dust-collecting filter is equipped, then contamination prevention is achieved, but the rotor width becomes wider and clogging occurs more easily without effective desorption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontamination preventionVSAvoid rotor width
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The dust-collecting filter is integrated into the detachable surface side portion rather than being a fixed separate component. This allows the filter to be removed and replaced along with the surface side portion, enabling effective desorption and preventing clogging while maintaining compact rotor dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient replacement of only the surface side, reducing exchange time and cost by up to one-third, maintaining performance and avoiding material waste, while allowing operation during maintenance and using unskilled personnel.

Implementation Method 1

An adsorption rotor functions as either an absorber of volatile organic compounds (hereafter called 'VOC') which are then released to make them denser, or as a dehumidifier by adsorbing moisture in air

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Implementation Method 2

adsorbed VOCs can be desorbed nearly completely by passing desorption air having a high temperature of not less than 300° C.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDesorption: Desorption

Implementation Method 3

promoting turbulent airflow for improved performance

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulence: Turbulence

Data Source

PatentUS8876957B2Adsorption rotor
Publication Date: 2014.11.04 SEIBU GIKEN CO LTD
  • US8876957B2 patent drawing
  • US8876957B2 patent drawing
  • US8876957B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An adsorption rotor has a surface layer which can be detached and replaced when performance degrades. A metal aggregate is extended in the width direction of the rotor element so that attachment-and-detachment adsorption rotor elements can be attached thereto using bolts and a perimeter griddle fixing bracket, thus resulting in protecting an upper part of the integral-type adsorption rotor element. In this way, the weight of the attachment-and-detachment adsorption rotor elements can be made light, resulting in them being fixable only using bolts, without special tools or skilled technicians. Moreover, because the detachment-and-replacement procedures can be performed from a rotor spindle side, thus from inside of a chamber, a heavy industrial machine is not required.