Tool-Free Replaceable Tines for Harvester Guide Assemblies

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing agricultural harvesters face difficulties in easily replacing guide assembly tines due to complex attachment methods, which often result in damage and require tools, leading to inefficiencies and potential rust from improper handling.

Innovation Solution

The design features a guide assembly where tines are secured to a guide member without extending through it, allowing for easy installation and removal without tools, using a mechanism with transition portions and mating features that enable secure engagement without disconnection from the frame.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If tines are wrapped, welded or bolted onto the pipe, then the tines are securely attached, but replacement becomes difficult and requires tools

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment strengthVSAvoidtine replacement ease
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The tine attachment system is segmented into modular components: the guide member with integrated attachment features and the tine with corresponding engagement features. This segmentation allows the tine to be independently removed and replaced without affecting the guide member or requiring tools, while maintaining secure attachment during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The attachment mechanism transitions from a static permanent connection (welding) to a dynamic system that allows both secure attachment during operation and easy release during maintenance. The tine can be firmly held in position during harvesting but quickly removed when needed, providing adaptability between operational and maintenance states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of manufacture

If tines are inserted through the guide member, then they can be secured, but the surface may be scratched and exposed to premature rust

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetine installation easeVSAvoidtine durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of inserting the tine through the guide member from one end to the other (which requires guiding through small holes and risks surface damage), the attachment features are inverted: the guide member has protruding attachment features that engage with corresponding features on the tine. This reversal allows the tine to be attached without being forced through tight spaces, eliminating surface scratching and rust exposure risks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Ease of operation

If the guide member is disconnected from the frame for tine replacement, then complete access is gained, but operational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetine replacement accessibilityVSAvoiddisconnection procedure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The tine is extracted as a separate, independently replaceable component from the guide member assembly. The attachment features are designed so the tine can be removed without disconnecting the guide member from the frame, separating the tine replacement operation from the guide member installation operation and simplifying the overall procedure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Strength

If traditional attachment methods are used, then secure fixation is achieved, but replacement time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetine fixation securityVSAvoidtine replacement time
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The attachment mechanism is designed to be self-servicing: the tine has integrated engagement features that automatically secure to the guide member without requiring external tools or complex procedures. The design enables quick attachment and detachment through simple manual operations, dramatically reducing replacement time while maintaining secure fixation during harvesting operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP2525642B1Replaceable guide assembly tines for an agricultural harvester
Publication Date: 2014.06.25 CNH IND BELGIUM NV
  • EP2525642B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2525642B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP2525642B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

An agricultural harvester is provided that includes a frame (14) carrying a structure (22) movable about an endless path to deliver a crop to a header. The frame (14) includes a guide assembly (32) including a guide member (28) supported by the frame (14). The frame (14) also includes at least one tine (30) secured to the guide member (28) without extending through the guide member (28), and the at least one tine (30/130/230) extending from the guide member (28) above the structure (22) to guide the crop between the at least one tine (30/130/230) and the structure (22) to the header. The at least one tine (30/130/230) is installable and removable from the guide member (28) without disconnecting the guide member (28) from the frame (14). At least one tine (30/130/230) is installable and removable from the guide member (28) substantially without tools.