Replaceable Cutting Head Coupling for Stable Rotary Tool Retention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional modular rotary cutting tools face issues with securely holding the cutting head due to deformation-based forces, leading to potential loosening during high cutting forces and vibrations, and existing screw-based solutions are complex, costly, and reduce tool stiffness, requiring tool removal for head changes.

Innovation Solution

A modular rotary cutting tool design featuring a tool shank with V-shaped contact surfaces and a coupling pin, allowing for secure engagement of the cutting head in multiple directions, reducing stress and enabling tool head replacement without removing the tool from the machine.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If deformation-based forces are used to hold the cutting head in the tool shank, then the structure is simple, but the cutting head loosens during high cutting forces and vibrations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure simplicityVSAvoidcutting head retention
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting tool is divided into modular components: a tool shank and a replaceable cutting head. The cutting head can be independently replaced without removing the entire tool from the machine, solving both the simplicity of structure and the reliability of cutting head retention during operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A coupling mechanism with V-shaped contact surfaces acts as an intermediary between the tool shank and cutting head. This coupling structure provides secure retention during cutting operations while allowing for easy replacement of the cutting head in place

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If a screw mechanism is used to hold the cutting head, then the cutting head is securely held, but the mechanism becomes complex, expensive, and requires more space

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting head retentionVSAvoidscrew mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex screw mechanism is extracted and replaced with a simplified coupling structure featuring V-shaped contact surfaces. This coupling mechanism achieves secure cutting head retention without the complexity, cost, and space requirements of traditional screw mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The coupling mechanism uses geometric parameters (V-shaped contact surfaces at specific angles) to achieve secure retention. By optimizing the angle and geometry of the contact surfaces, the design achieves reliable cutting head holding without complex adjustment mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If a screw mechanism is used to hold the cutting head, then the cutting head is securely held, but the tool must be removed from the machine to change the cutting head

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting head retentionVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting tool is segmented into a tool shank and a replaceable cutting head, allowing the cutting head to be independently replaced in place without removing the entire tool from the machine, thereby maintaining productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The coupling mechanism allows for dynamic replacement of the cutting head during operation. The cutting head can be quickly released and replaced by actuating the coupling mechanism, enabling maintenance without tool removal and improving operational efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of manufacture

If conventional cutting tool design is used, then manufacturing is simple, but stress in the tool increases during machining operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidtool stress resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

Dividing the tool into modular components allows each part to be optimized for its specific function. The tool shank and cutting head can be manufactured separately with optimized stress distributions, reducing overall tool stress during machining while maintaining manufacturing simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The V-shaped contact surfaces are designed with specific geometric parameters that optimize stress distribution during cutting operations. By carefully selecting the angles and dimensions of the contact surfaces, the design reduces stress concentrations in the tool while maintaining ease of manufacture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11471952B2Cutting tool having replaceable cutting head and method of securing a replaceable cutting head
Publication Date: 2022.10.18 KENNAMETAL INC
  • US11471952B2 patent drawing
  • US11471952B2 patent drawing
  • US11471952B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A rotary cutting tool includes a tool shank, a replaceable cutting head mounted on the tool shank, a coupling pin, and an actuation member. In one embodiment, the coupling pin has a cylindrical portion with a reduced-diameter portion defined by a pair of angled side walls separated by a bottom surface for cooperating with a non-threaded portion at one end of the actuation member. In another embodiment, the coupling pin has a cylindrical portion with a notch with a pair of side walls for cooperating with a frustoconical member at one end of the actuation member. When assembled, a pair of V-shaped contact surfaces on the cutting head engage a pair of oppositely facing V-shaped contact surfaces on the tool shank to provide stability against the momentum created by cutting forces in two different directions and securely hold the cutting head in place during machining operations.