Replaceable Shovel Blade via Segmented Fastening

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Shovel blades become dull due to wear and tear, leading to increased user exertion and eventually reach the end of their life cycle, necessitating disposal rather than replacement of the tool.

Innovation Solution

A digging tool design featuring a replaceable blade system, where different types of blades can be interchanged using a receiving plate with various fastening mechanisms, such as fasteners, clips, or hooks, allowing for secure attachment and easy replacement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the shovel blade is made as a fixed, integrated part of the tool, then the structural strength and simplicity are improved, but the blade cannot be replaced when dull, leading to complete tool disposal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidblade replaceability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The shovel is divided into separate components: a handle assembly and a blade assembly that can be independently replaced. The blade is detached from the handle through a receiving plate mechanism, allowing the blade to be replaced when dull while retaining the handle assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The blade is designed to be discarded when dull and replaced with a fresh blade. The handle assembly and receiving plate are recovered and retained, eliminating the need to discard the entire tool. This extends the tool's lifespan by allowing blade replacement rather than complete tool disposal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

2Adaptability or versatility

If the blade is made replaceable with a complex fastening system, then blade replacement capability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade replaceabilityVSAvoidfastening system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fastening system is segmented into discrete components: a receiving plate with openings, fasteners, and a blade with corresponding mounting features. This modular approach allows for straightforward assembly and disassembly without complex mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The receiving plate serves multiple functions: it provides the attachment interface for the blade, structural reinforcement at the junction point, and a mounting surface for the fastening mechanism. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of manufacture

If the blade is fixed permanently to the handle, then manufacturing simplicity is improved, but the tool reaches end-of-life when the blade becomes dull

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidtool lifespan
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The shovel is manufactured as separable components (handle assembly and blade assembly) that can be independently produced and then assembled. This allows the blade to be replaced when dull while retaining the handle assembly, extending the tool's overall lifespan.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The blade is designed as a consumable component that is discarded when dull, while the handle assembly and receiving plate are recovered and retained for future blade installations. This extends the tool's service life by allowing multiple blade replacements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

4Reliability

If a secure fastening mechanism is used to attach the blade, then blade attachment reliability is improved, but the ease of blade replacement decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade attachment reliabilityVSAvoidblade replacement ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The fastening system uses discrete fasteners that can be independently removed to detach the blade. This segmented approach allows for secure attachment during use while enabling straightforward removal when blade replacement is needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The fastening mechanism is designed to be user-operated without requiring special tools or complex procedures. The fasteners can be manually removed and reinstalled by the user, enabling easy blade replacement while maintaining secure attachment during normal use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20230083473A1Shovel with replaceable blade
Publication Date: 2023.03.16 MUNSON IND
  • US20230083473A1 patent drawing
  • US20230083473A1 patent drawing
  • US20230083473A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A digging tool is described herein having a handle, the handle having a first end and a second end, fasteners, wherein the fasteners have a head and a body, and a blade, the blade have a front surface and a back surface, wherein the blade is removably attached to the second end of the handle via fasteners such that the head of the fastener is substantially flush with the back surface of the blade.