Customer-Specific Replacement Component Pricing Engine

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems fail to provide optimal, customer-specific pricing for replacement components of equipment, as they often rely on manufacturing costs and do not account for individual customer data, making it resource-intensive and time-consuming to determine prices that maximize profitability.

Innovation Solution

A method that collects customer-specific data such as past prices, purchase quantities, and customer metrics to determine customer-specific weights and scores, which are then used to calculate optimization metrics and apply adjustments through an optimization engine to generate personalized prices for replacement components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If component retailers price components based on manufacturing costs or general business information, then pricing is simple and consistent, but optimal customer-specific prices cannot be provided

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepricing simplicityVSAvoidcustomer-specific price optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the customer base into different groups based on their characteristics, purchase behavior, and value to the retailer. By dividing customers into segments (e.g., high-volume purchasers, price-sensitive customers, strategic partners), the system can apply different pricing strategies to each segment, achieving customer-specific optimization while maintaining operational feasibility through automated classification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes pricing parameters based on customer-specific data including purchase history, volume discounts, strategic importance, and market conditions. By adjusting price parameters individually for different customers or customer segments, the system transitions from static cost-based pricing to dynamic value-based pricing, resolving the contradiction between simplicity and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If optimal customer-specific prices are determined for each customer, then pricing adaptability and profitability are improved, but the process becomes resource intensive and time consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer-specific price optimizationVSAvoidpricing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-calculating customer segments, establishing pricing rules and algorithms in advance, and preparing optimization frameworks before actual pricing decisions are needed. This preliminary setup enables rapid generation of customer-specific prices when needed, reducing the time and resources required for real-time pricing optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service pricing by automating the entire customer-specific pricing process through algorithms that automatically analyze customer data, apply optimization criteria, and generate recommended prices without requiring manual intervention for each customer. This automation maintains high adaptability while dramatically improving productivity by eliminating resource-intensive manual pricing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive customer data is collected and analyzed, then pricing accuracy and profitability are improved, but system complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepricing accuracyVSAvoiddata collection and processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the most critical customer data elements needed for pricing decisions, such as purchase volume, frequency, customer lifetime value, and strategic importance metrics. By selectively extracting and focusing on key data points rather than analyzing all available customer information, the system achieves high pricing accuracy while managing data processing complexity through targeted data selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20240330967A1Systems and methods for optimal replacement component pricing
Publication Date: 2024.10.03 CATERPILLAR INC
  • US20240330967A1 patent drawing
  • US20240330967A1 patent drawing
  • US20240330967A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present technology is generally directed to systems and methods for determining a customer-specific price for a replacement component of a machine. The present technology can include collecting, for one or more customers, data associated with the replacement component. For each of the customer(s), the present technology can further include determining one or more customer-specific factors; using the customer-specific factors(s) to determine one or more optimization metric(s); applying an optimization engine to the optimization metric(s) to determine a customer-specific adjustment; and inputting the customer-specific adjustment into a pricing system to generate a future price for the replacement component.