Replacement Cost Estimation Using Environmental and Utility Costs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The timing of replacing apparatuses often lacks optimization due to subjective, user-initiated decisions based solely on economic and functional considerations, leading to premature or delayed replacements compared to their actual useful lifetimes and the benefits offered by new technologies.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for estimating replacement costs that consider environmental costs and utility costs, using a system with a computing apparatus that calculates exergy loss and net benefits to determine whether to replace existing technologies with new ones, incorporating sensors and modules for data input and processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If replacement decisions are based solely on user-initiated economic and functional considerations, then decision-making simplicity is improved, but replacement timing optimization deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision-making simplicityVSAvoidreplacement timing optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically calculating replacement costs and generating replacement recommendations without requiring manual user input for each calculation. The computing apparatus autonomously processes environmental cost data, utility cost data, and technology performance data to produce optimized replacement timing decisions, eliminating the need for complex manual economic analysis while improving replacement timing optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Loss of time

If environmental costs and utility costs are incorporated into replacement cost estimation, then replacement timing optimization is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereplacement timing optimizationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the replacement cost estimation into distinct modular components: environmental cost calculation module, utility cost calculation module, performance degradation analysis module, and recommendation generation module. Each module processes specific data types and produces intermediate results that are integrated by the computing apparatus, making the complex system manageable and maintainable while achieving comprehensive replacement timing optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive environmental and utility cost analysis is performed, then accuracy of replacement cost estimation is improved, but computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of replacement cost estimationVSAvoidcomputational resources required
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by focusing computational resources on the most significant cost factors for each specific technology and organization context. The computing apparatus analyzes environmental and utility costs selectively based on relevance to the particular technology being evaluated, performing comprehensive analysis only where necessary while using simplified models for less critical factors, thereby achieving accurate replacement cost estimation without excessive computational resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS8452626B2Technology replacement cost estimation using environmental cost considerations
Publication Date: 2013.05.28 HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEV LP
  • US8452626B2 patent drawing
  • US8452626B2 patent drawing
  • US8452626B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a method of estimating a replacement cost associated with an existing technology performed by a processor, one or more costs associated with implementing the existing technology are obtained, in which the one or more costs include an environmental cost and a utility cost associated with implementing the existing technology. In addition, an existing net benefit of continuing implementation of the existing technology based upon the obtained one or more costs are calculated.