Replacement Query Engine for Marketplace Listings

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Buyers on online marketplaces often face frustration when their offers are declined, leading to discouragement and repetitive searches for alternative sellers, resulting in inefficient use of resources and increased effort in resubmitting queries.

Innovation Solution

An online marketplace system that automatically identifies and surfaces alternative listings and generates replacement queries based on item attributes, seller reputation, and acceptance history, allowing buyers to receive notifications and offers from top sellers within a limited time frame.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If buyers manually perform searches and resubmit offers after declined offers, then they can find alternative sellers, but it increases their effort and time consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of finding alternative sellersVSAvoidtime for repetitive searches
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-identifies and stores alternative listings with similar item attributes before buyers need to search. When an offer is declined, the system has already prepared replacement queries based on the original search criteria, eliminating the need for buyers to manually restart their search process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically performs the search and offer resubmission process without requiring buyer intervention. The replacement query engine autonomously identifies alternative sellers, generates new offers, and presents options to buyers, allowing the system to serve itself in completing the transaction search.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If buyers resubmit queries manually for alternative sellers, then they can continue pursuing the item, but it consumes additional computing resources and network traffic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of offer submissionVSAvoidprocessor cycles and network traffic
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system combines multiple separate operations (searching for alternatives, filtering by attributes, generating offers, and submitting queries) into a single automated replacement query process. This consolidation reduces redundant computing operations and network communications that would occur if buyers manually performed each step.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates replacement queries by copying and adapting the original search parameters and offer structure. Instead of requiring buyers to manually recreate search queries and offers, the system generates copies modified with alternative seller information, significantly reducing the computational and network resources required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system provides multiple alternative offers to buyers, then buyers have more options, but it increases system complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of alternative offersVSAvoidcomplexity of query generation system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex task of finding alternative sellers into distinct functional modules: attribute extraction from original listings, similarity matching algorithm, seller identification, and query generation. This modular segmentation manages system complexity by organizing the versatility-providing functionality into manageable, independent components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20240095816A1Generating replacement queries for alternate listings with desired item attributes
Publication Date: 2024.03.21 EBAY INC
  • US20240095816A1 patent drawing
  • US20240095816A1 patent drawing
  • US20240095816A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A server receives an initial query that identifies a first item listed by a first user account and an initial query value for the first item. The server provides the initial query to a first computing device associated with the first user account and receives a first response to the initial query from the first computing device. The first response indicates a rejection of the initial query value. In response to the rejection, the server identifies a second item listed by a second user account. The second item includes a shared attribute with the first item. The server substitutes the initial query with a replacement query that identifies the second item and the initial query value for the first item. The replacement query is provided to a second computing device associated with the second user account.