Message Reply Recipient Suggestions Using Shared Group Context

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing messaging applications require manual selection of recipients for group messages, which is time-consuming and inefficient, and current solutions do not utilize context to suggest relevant recipients.

Innovation Solution

A messaging application that suggests relevant groups and individuals based on context by analyzing group membership, recent interactions, and message content using advanced algorithms and machine learning to facilitate efficient recipient selection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual recipient selection is used, then user control over message delivery is ensured, but time consumption and operational effort increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecipient selection easeVSAvoidtime for recipient selection
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-processes and analyzes group membership data, message content, and interaction history before the user needs to select recipients. By preparing suggestion lists in advance based on contextual analysis, the system reduces the time required for recipient selection while maintaining user control through optional review and modification of suggestions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically performs recipient suggestion generation by analyzing message content, group memberships, and interaction patterns without requiring manual input from the user. The algorithm self-adjusts and refines suggestions based on contextual cues, freeing the user from the manual task of selecting recipients while preserving the ability to override or modify suggestions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Device complexity

If simple character-based contact suggestions are used, then implementation complexity is reduced, but contextual relevance and suggestion accuracy deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuggestion system complexityVSAvoidsuggestion relevance accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from one-dimensional character-based matching to multi-dimensional contextual analysis by incorporating message content semantics, group membership relationships, interaction history, and recipient roles. This dimensional expansion enables more accurate and contextually relevant suggestions while managing complexity through structured data organization and modular processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces contextual analysis algorithms as intermediaries between the user's messaging intent and the recipient selection process. These intermediaries analyze message content, group structures, and interaction patterns to generate refined suggestions, bridging the gap between simple input and accurate recipient recommendations without requiring direct complex user-input processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If contextual analysis algorithms are implemented, then suggestion accuracy improves, but computational processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuggestion relevance accuracyVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies contextual analysis selectively rather than comprehensively to all possible recipients. It focuses computational resources on analyzing the most promising candidates based on initial filters such as group membership and message content keywords, performing full contextual analysis only on a subset of potential recipients to reduce overall energy consumption while maintaining suggestion accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary filtering and preprocessing of candidate recipients based on coarse criteria such as group membership and message topic before applying more computationally intensive contextual analysis. This staged approach reduces the number of candidates requiring deep analysis, thereby lowering overall energy consumption while preserving suggestion quality for the most relevant recipients.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12563007B2Suggesting relevant groups and individuals in message replies
Publication Date: 2026.02.24 SNAP INC
  • US12563007B2 patent drawing
  • US12563007B2 patent drawing
  • US12563007B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for suggesting relevant groups and recipients when replying to messages in a messaging application. In response to a first received message, the system identifies groups with membership comprising the sender and receiver. Interface elements representing these mutual groups are displayed as selectable suggestions. The receiving user can choose groups to include in the reply, along with other users. Suggested groups are determined based on recent interactions, mutual connections, and message content. Users can also create new groups from suggestions for ongoing messaging. By recommending shared groups and relevant recipients, the system enables efficient context-based selection when replying. The suggestions aim to streamline recipient picking through intuitive interfaces and machine learning algorithms. This improves the user experience for seamless messaging discussions with appropriate recipients.