Ex Vivo Reprogrammed Immune Cells for Renal Failure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current treatments for kidney failure, including chronic and acute forms, are inadequate in preventing or reversing renal damage and fibrosis, particularly in cases induced by ischemia/reperfusion injury, chemotherapy, and autoimmune-mediated conditions.

Innovation Solution

The method involves identifying patients with renal failure, extracting immune cells, contacting them with regenerative cells to impart inhibitory properties, and administering these modified immune cells back into the patient to prevent or reverse renal failure, using techniques such as culturing with activators like Pam3CSK4, Poly:IC, and LPS to activate specific immune receptors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional treatments for kidney failure are used, then current standard care is provided, but renal damage and fibrosis are not effectively prevented or reversed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffectiveness in preventing/reversing renal damageVSAvoidrenal fibrosis and tissue damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses regenerative cells as intermediary agents that transfer reprogramming factors to immune cells. These regenerative cells act as mediators between the patient's immune system and the desired therapeutic outcome, enabling the immune cells to acquire pro-regenerative properties without direct manipulation of the kidney tissue itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the functional parameters of immune cells by contacting them with regenerative cells in vitro. This reprogramming process alters the expression profile and functional characteristics of the immune cells, transforming them from their original state to a pro-regenerative state that can inhibit fibrosis and promote tissue repair when administered back to the patient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If immune cells are extracted and modified in vitro, then therapeutic properties are enhanced, but the process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetherapeutic efficacy of immune cellsVSAvoidcell processing and modification system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The regenerative cells perform the reprogramming function through direct cell-to-cell contact with the immune cells in culture. The regenerative cells utilize their inherent regenerative properties and secreted factors to automatically transfer reprogramming signals, eliminating the need for complex external reprogramming systems or direct genetic manipulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The regenerative cells serve as a natural intermediary that simplifies the reprogramming process. Instead of requiring complex in vitro reprogramming protocols, the regenerative cells mediate the transfer of therapeutic properties through their contact with immune cells, reducing the overall system complexity while maintaining therapeutic efficacy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If reprogrammed immune cells are administered to reverse renal failure, then therapeutic reversal is achieved, but the risk of immune response and tissue damage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to reverse renal failureVSAvoidimmune-mediated tissue damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The immune cells are reprogrammed to recognize and respond to renal damage signals in a regulated manner. The reprogramming process equips the immune cells with the ability to selectively target damaged tissue while sparing healthy tissue, using the patient's own damage signals as guidance for therapeutic action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The reprogrammed immune cells exhibit local quality by responding specifically to the chemical and physical signals present at the site of renal damage. This localized response ensures that the therapeutic effect is concentrated at the site of injury rather than causing widespread immune activity, thereby reducing the risk of immune-mediated damage to healthy tissue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively inhibits and reverses renal failure by enhancing the immune system's ability to address renal damage, fibrosis, and ischemia/reperfusion injury, offering a prophylactic and therapeutic solution for various kidney disease scenarios.

Implementation Method 1

contacting said immune cells with regenerative cells in a manner so that regenerative cells endow onto said immune cells properties capable of inhibiting and/or reversing renal failure and/or renal fibrosis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCell-to-cell contact transfer:

Implementation Method 2

using techniques such as culturing with activators like Pam3CSK4, Poly:IC, and LPS to activate specific immune receivers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImmune receptor activation:

Data Source

PatentUS20220233592A1Treatment of kidney failure using ex vivo reprogrammed immune cells
Publication Date: 2022.07.28 CREATIVE MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US20220233592A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are treatment methods, protocols, and compositions of matter useful for treatment of kidney failure. The invention discloses, in one embodiment, administration of immune cells that have been reprogrammed by co-culture with regenerative cells. In one embodiment said regenerative cells are umbilical cord derived mesenchymal stem cells and said immune cells are peripheral blood mononuclear cells. In one embodiment cells are cultured together in the presence of interleukin 2 and/or an mTOR inhibitor. In one embodiment said cells are cultured together in the presence of an anti-CD3 and/or anti-CD28 antibody.