2D Repulsive Force Model for Vehicle Collision Avoidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing collision avoidance systems in vehicles are not flexible enough for various collision scenarios, particularly on non-straight roads, and are difficult for engineers to understand due to their reliance on non-linear state equations and multiple cost functions, which complicates the definition of control thresholds.

Innovation Solution

A method using 2D repulsive forces to calculate curved paths that include deceleration and lateral forces, allowing for flexible collision avoidance on both straight and curved roads, with control thresholds determined geometrically, and the integration of AI for enhanced reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If MPC (Model Predictive Control) is used to calculate optimal paths with non-linear state equations and multiple cost functions, then the collision avoidance can be solved for complicated scenarios, but the control method becomes physically incomprehensible to vehicle engineers and difficult to define control thresholds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision scenario coverageVSAvoidcontrol algorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a virtual 2D environment that copies the essential physics of vehicle collision avoidance in a simplified manner. Instead of using complex non-linear state equations, it uses a 2D force model with repulsive forces from virtual walls and attractive forces toward target points, reproducing the collision avoidance effect while maintaining physical intuitiveness and geometric interpretability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter representation from complex non-linear state equations to simple geometric parameters in a 2D plane. The control thresholds are defined geometrically based on the 2D force model, making them physically comprehensible and easy to adjust for different collision scenarios without requiring complex mathematical optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If straight braking and parallel lane change control modes are used, then the control method is physically understandable by automotive engineers, but the method is not flexible enough for various kinds of collision scenarios and can only be applied to straight road conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol threshold definitionVSAvoidcollision scenario coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal 2D force model that can handle multiple collision scenarios including straight roads, curved roads, and various obstacle configurations through a single unified algorithm. The repulsive force from virtual walls and attractive force toward target points work together to generate appropriate avoidance paths for different scenarios without requiring separate control strategies

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent naturally handles curved road conditions by working in a 2D geometric space where curves are inherently supported. The virtual wall repulsive forces and target point attractive forces automatically adapt to curved geometries, enabling the system to handle both straight and curved collision scenarios with the same physical model

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Ease of operation

If related art methods without brake force during lane change are used, then the control activation thresholds can be determined, but the distance from control starting position to obstacles is longer than necessary

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol activation thresholdVSAvoiddistance to obstacle
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the deceleration function and lateral avoidance function into a single unified 2D force model. The repulsive force from virtual walls simultaneously provides both lateral steering guidance and longitudinal deceleration components, eliminating the need for separate control activations and reducing the distance to obstacle while maintaining clear threshold definition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS10611368B2Method and system for collision avoidance
Publication Date: 2020.04.07 HITACHI LTD
  • US10611368B2 patent drawing
  • US10611368B2 patent drawing
  • US10611368B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Example implementations involve systems and methods to control the ego vehicle to trace connected plural curved paths, which are calculated as the movement of the vehicle against vertical repulsive force from straight or curved walls, and connected continuously at the joints, and differentiable by position at the joints. Further, the repulsion force acts as deceleration force and lateral force.