Reputation Mashup for Trust Determination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users face difficulties in determining the trustworthiness of online resources and individuals, leading to discomfort and a potential chilling effect on internet activities due to the inability to make informed trust decisions.

Innovation Solution

The technique of reputation mashup, which involves combining, aggregating, and organizing reputation data from multiple sources into a uniform format to facilitate trust decisions, allowing clients to make informed decisions about interacting with resources by presenting combined reputation data and enabling or restricting interactions based on trust determinations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If reputation data from multiple sources is combined and aggregated, then the comprehensiveness and reliability of trust determination is improved, but the complexity of data processing and system architecture increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrust determination accuracyVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex reputation assessment task into distinct functional modules: a reputation data collection module that gathers data from multiple sources, a data processing module that normalizes and aggregates the collected data, and a trust determination module that uses the processed data to make trust decisions. This segmentation reduces system complexity by creating independent, manageable components with clear interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary reputation processing system that acts as a mediator between raw reputation data from multiple sources and the final trust determination. This intermediary layer collects, standardizes, and aggregates data from diverse sources into a uniform format, simplifying the overall system architecture by providing a single point of integration rather than direct connections between all data sources and the trust determination logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive reputation data is collected from multiple sources, then the quality of trust decisions is improved, but the time and computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrust assessment accuracyVSAvoiddata collection and processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-collecting and pre-processing reputation data from multiple sources before it is needed for trust determination. Reputation data is gathered and normalized in advance, stored in a structured format, and made readily available when trust assessments are required. This eliminates the need for time-consuming data collection and processing at the moment of decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements continuous reputation data collection and processing, maintaining an ongoing stream of updated reputation information from multiple sources. Rather than performing discrete, periodic assessments, the system continuously monitors and updates reputation data, ensuring that trust determinations are always based on the most current and comprehensive information available without requiring intensive batch processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS8943211B2Reputation mashup
Publication Date: 2015.01.27 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US8943211B2 patent drawing
  • US8943211B2 patent drawing
  • US8943211B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for reputation mashup are described. Reputation mashup refers to combining, aggregating, collecting, compiling, or otherwise organizing reputation data from multiple sources into a uniform format to facilitate making trust decisions for resources. In an implementation, reputation data for a resource is combined from a plurality of reputation sources. The combined reputation data for the resource is presented to a client to enable a trust determination to be made for the resource. Interaction with the resource by the client is selectively enabled or restricted in accordance with the trust determination made using the combined reputation data.