Reputation-Impacted Rate Determination via Regression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems lack the ability to effectively incorporate online reputation scores into pricing decisions, failing to capture consumer willingness to pay based on product reputation, which is crucial for businesses in industries like hospitality, airlines, and rental cars.

Innovation Solution

A system that generates reputation-impacted rates by analyzing historical reputation and rate information using a multiple linear regression model, combining reputation indices with demand and rate indices to determine optimal pricing, smoothing out noise and accounting for lead times and special events.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If online reputation systems are used to generate and publish ratings and reviews, then consumers can make better purchasing decisions, but businesses cannot effectively incorporate these reputation scores into pricing decisions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereputation information utilizationVSAvoidpricing decision capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the pricing decision process into distinct components: a reputation index module that processes reputation data separately, a rate index module that handles historical rate information, and a price determination module that combines them. This segmentation allows reputation information to be systematically integrated into pricing without disrupting existing pricing mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary processing system that acts as a mediator between reputation data and pricing decisions. The reputation index and rate index serve as intermediate representations that translate raw reputation scores and historical rates into comparable metrics, enabling their integration through the multiple linear regression model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If reputation scores are incorporated into pricing models, then consumer willingness to pay can be captured, but the complexity of the pricing system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepricing accuracyVSAvoidpricing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal pricing framework using multiple linear regression that can handle multiple input variables (reputation index, rate index, demand index, indicator variables) through a single unified model. This multi-functional approach allows the system to process diverse data types while maintaining a consistent pricing output structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms complex reputation data into a standardized reputation index parameter, and similarly transforms historical rates into a rate index parameter. These parameter transformations convert unstructured or semi-structured data into quantifiable metrics that can be directly used in the pricing model, reducing complexity while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If historical rate information and reputation information are analyzed using multiple linear regression, then reputation-impacted rates can be determined, but the computational processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverate determination accuracyVSAvoidcomputational processing power
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary processing of raw data into standardized indices before the main regression analysis. The reputation index module pre-processes reputation data, and the rate index module pre-processes historical rate information. This preliminary action reduces the complexity of the main computational task by providing cleaned, normalized input data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a modular processing architecture where only necessary components are activated based on available data. The system can selectively process reputation information, rate information, demand information, or indicator variables depending on what data is available, avoiding unnecessary computational overhead while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9934518B2Online reputation impacted information systems
Publication Date: 2018.04.03 SAS INSTITUTE INC
  • US9934518B2 patent drawing
  • US9934518B2 patent drawing
  • US9934518B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments may be generally directed to techniques and an apparatus to generate a plurality of rate indices from the historical rate information for one or more products, each of the rate indices associated with a different lead time, and determine a rate index from the plurality of rate indices associated with an optimal lead time based on a maximum correlation between the rate index and a reputation index, the reputation index based on the historical reputation information for the one or more products. In addition, a multiple linear regression model comprising one or more parameters may be generated using the rate index, the reputation index, and one or more indicator values, the multiple linear regression model may be used to determine a reputation impacted rate for a product.