Requirements Characterization Profile for Hiring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Generic requirements requests often lead to inefficiencies and unsuitable matches due to lack of specificity and knowledge, resulting in poor candidate suitability in hiring processes and other fields, where non-specialists may draw up requirements without exhaustive knowledge or relevant information.

Innovation Solution

A method for determining a requirements characterization profile by receiving classification parameters, selecting entities from a database, retrieving characterization parameters, and constructing a profile using significance classification, with Bayesian probability adjustments and assessment methods to refine and optimize the request.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a generic requirements request is drawn up by a non-specialist, then the request can be created quickly and easily, but the request lacks specificity and results in unsuitable matches

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of creating requirements requestVSAvoidspecificity of requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis by automatically identifying essential features from a database of previously assessed entities before the user finalizes the requirements request. This preliminary action ensures that critical specifications are captured even when the user lacks domain expertise, resolving the contradiction between quick creation and precise specification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback to the user by highlighting identified essential features and allowing review and revision. This feedback mechanism enables non-specialists to create specific requirements requests without needing exhaustive domain knowledge, as the system guides them through the essential specifications based on historical data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If a specialist draws up a specific requirements request with exhaustive knowledge, then the request achieves high precision and suitability, but the process becomes more complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespecificity of requirementsVSAvoidcomplexity of requirements process
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically analyzing the requirements input, identifying essential features, and generating a structured requirements characterization profile without requiring the user to manually specify all parameters. This automation maintains high precision while reducing the complexity and time burden on the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by automatically determining the importance weighting of different features based on statistical analysis of previously assessed entities. This parameter adjustment occurs in the background, providing specialist-level precision without requiring the user to manually configure complex weighting schemes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If essential features are over-specified in the requirements request, then the request becomes highly specific, but suitable matches are needlessly rejected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespecificity of requirementsVSAvoidrange of suitable matches
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by identifying only the essential features that truly matter for suitability, rather than requiring all possible specifications to be defined. This selective approach maintains high specificity for critical features while avoiding over-specification that would reject suitable matches, achieving the right balance between precision and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Ease of operation

If important features are under-specified or given insufficient weighting, then the requirements request remains generic and easy to create, but unsuitable matches are not filtered out

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of creating requirements requestVSAvoidsuitability of matches
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides feedback by automatically analyzing the requirements input and identifying which features should be weighted as essential based on historical assessment data. This feedback ensures that important features receive appropriate weighting without requiring the user to have expert knowledge, maintaining ease of operation while improving reliability of match suitability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10977281B2Requirements characterisation
Publication Date: 2021.04.13 SHL GRP LTD
  • US10977281B2 patent drawing
  • US10977281B2 patent drawing
  • US10977281B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of determining a requirements characterization profile for an entity is disclosed. The method comprises the steps of receiving classification parameters defining a requirement for an entity and selecting, in dependence on the classification parameters, a set of entities from a database of previously assessed entities. The method further comprises retrieving from the database characterization parameters of the selected set of entities, and constructing, in dependence on the characterization parameters, a requirements characterization profile for the entity. An apparatus is provided that comprised means for performing such a method.