Anomaly Detection Using Resampled User Behavior Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for detecting anomalies in large data sets, such as in computer network security and healthcare, often fail to classify user behavior as anomalous even if the user has permission to access resources, leading to missed detections and false positives.

Innovation Solution

A data processing system that generates user behavior models by analyzing access patterns over time, using techniques like principal component analysis, singular value decomposition, and topic modeling to identify deviations in resource access, and classifies behavior as anomalous based on differences between initial and resampled models.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional anomaly detection methods are used to detect user behavior anomalies, then the system can identify some obvious anomalies, but it fails to classify user behavior as anomalous even when the user has permission to access resources, leading to missed detections and false positives

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection accuracyVSAvoidbehavior classification precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms user behavior data into different feature representations by changing parameters such as time aggregation levels, resource access patterns, and behavioral metrics. This allows the system to detect anomalies by comparing multiple parameter representations of the same behavior, improving both reliability and measurement precision in anomaly classification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces additional dimensions for analyzing user behavior, including temporal dimensions (different time periods), resource dimensions (different types of accessed resources), and comparative dimensions (peer user behavior). This multi-dimensional approach enables more accurate anomaly detection by examining behavior from multiple perspectives simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If the system analyzes user behavior at a detailed granular level to detect unexpected file type access, then it enhances anomaly detection sensitivity, but it increases computational complexity and data processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection sensitivityVSAvoiddata processing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments user behavior analysis into distinct components: file type access patterns, temporal access patterns, resource hierarchy patterns, and peer comparison patterns. This segmentation allows the system to process detailed granular data through modular analysis steps, enhancing sensitivity while managing computational complexity through structured processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary aggregation and filtering of user behavior data before detailed anomaly analysis. By pre-processing data to identify relevant patterns and normalize behavior representations, the system reduces the computational burden of detailed granular analysis while maintaining high detection sensitivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If the system incorporates peer behavior analysis to reduce false positives, then it improves classification accuracy, but it increases the quantity of data that must be processed and stored

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse positive reductionVSAvoiddata volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates universal peer groups that can be applied across multiple users with similar roles or access patterns. Instead of storing and processing individual peer data for each user comparison, the system establishes universal behavioral profiles that serve multiple users, reducing data volume while maintaining the false-positive-reducing benefit of peer analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses representative sampling and data aggregation techniques where detailed peer behavior data is copied into summarized statistical representations. This allows the system to incorporate peer behavior analysis for false positive reduction while storing and processing only essential aggregated metrics rather than complete raw behavior logs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS11727311B2Classifying user behavior as anomalous
Publication Date: 2023.08.15 VMWARE INC
  • US11727311B2 patent drawing
  • US11727311B2 patent drawing
  • US11727311B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on computer storage media, for classifying user behavior as anomalous. One of the methods includes obtaining user behavior data representing behavior of a user in a subject system. An initial model is generated from training data, the initial model having first characteristic features of the training data. A resampling model is generated from the training data and from multiple instances of the first representation for a test time period. A difference between the initial model and the resampling model is computed. The user behavior in the test time period is classified as anomalous based on the difference between the initial model and the resampling model.