Rescue Breathing Sensor System for Real-Time Parameter Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Effective rescue breathing in newborns is challenging due to the need to monitor multiple parameters simultaneously, such as respiratory rate, tidal volume, and mask seal integrity, which can be difficult for a single clinician to manage, especially in emergency situations where assistance is not available.

Innovation Solution

A system with sensors to measure ventilatory volume, gas concentration, respiratory rate, and mask pressure, connected to a processor that analyzes data and provides real-time feedback through a display unit, allowing clinicians to monitor and correct parameters quickly, even when alone.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple parameters are monitored simultaneously during rescue breathing, then the quality of resuscitation improves, but the difficulty of operation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of resuscitationVSAvoiddifficulty of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the monitoring task into separate sensor modules, each dedicated to measuring a specific parameter (ventilatory volume, gas concentration, respiratory rate, mask pressure). This segmentation allows the complex monitoring function to be broken down into manageable, specialized components that can operate independently and report to a central processing system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A processor acts as an intermediary between the multiple sensors and the clinician. The processor receives data from all sensors, integrates the information, and presents it in a unified display. This intermediary consolidates the complex multi-parameter data into a single interface, making it easier for the clinician to monitor all parameters simultaneously without being overwhelmed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of time

If a single clinician performs rescue breathing alone, then the response time improves, but the measurement precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidmeasurement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables a single clinician to perform both the rescue breathing procedure and the monitoring functions simultaneously. The automated sensors and processor handle the measurement and analysis tasks, allowing the clinician to focus on delivering ventilation while the system independently monitors all critical parameters with high precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual monitoring methods (visual observation of chest movement) are replaced with automated electronic sensors that measure ventilatory volume, gas concentration, respiratory rate, and mask pressure. This substitution of mechanical/manual monitoring with electronic measurement systems dramatically improves measurement precision while enabling single-clinician operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If two individuals perform rescue breathing together, then the measurement precision improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement precisionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is designed as a single integrated device that performs multiple functions: measuring ventilatory volume, analyzing gas concentration, detecting respiratory rate, and monitoring mask pressure. This multi-functional design consolidates what would otherwise require multiple separate monitoring tools and personnel into one universal system that can be operated by a single clinician.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Ease of operation

If manual monitoring of chest wall movement is used, then the ease of operation is maintained, but the difficulty of detecting and measuring increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoiddifficulty of detecting and measuring
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

Visual observation of chest wall movement is replaced with electronic sensors that directly measure ventilatory volume and respiratory parameters. This substitution transforms a subjective, difficult-to-quantify visual task into an objective, precisely measurable electronic signal, dramatically improving detection capability while maintaining ease of operation through automated measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10507296B2System and method for teaching, practicing and performing effective rescue breathing
Publication Date: 2019.12.17 NIHON KOHDEN CORP
  • US10507296B2 patent drawing
  • US10507296B2 patent drawing
  • US10507296B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system includes: a first sensor configured to measure one of a ventilatory volume, a concentration of gas, a respiratory rate and a respiratory pressure; a second sensor configured to measure a pressure associated with a mask adapted to be attached to a human patient or a mannequin; a processor configured to analyze a measurement value of the first sensor and a measurement value of the second sensor; and an output unit connected to the processor, and configured to output, based on a result of the analysis of the processor, at least one of: a condition of the mask adapted to be attached to the human patient or the mannequin; and a condition of the human patient or the mannequin.