Research Note System for Comparative Decision Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users face challenges in effectively tracking and comparing multiple alternatives during the purchasing process, often leading to non-optimal decisions due to the complexity of gathering and prioritizing information across various factors.

Innovation Solution

A research note system that detects users' comparative decision-making intentions and provides a structured way to create, share, and manage research notes, allowing users to organize and prioritize information on competing items, with features like item suggestion, factor selection, and social interaction for feedback.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If users manually track and compare multiple alternatives using crude notes or spreadsheets, then they can maintain some level of organization, but the complexity of gathering and prioritizing information increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of tracking alternativesVSAvoidcomplexity of information organization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a research note system as an intermediary tool between users and the complex task of comparing multiple alternatives. This system automatically detects when users are researching alternatives and provides a structured framework for organizing information, factors, and comparisons, thereby reducing the manual effort and complexity involved in tracking multiple options

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the complex decision-making process into manageable components by automatically identifying alternative items and organizing them into distinct research notes. Each research note can be divided into specific factors and criteria, allowing users to systematically break down complex comparisons into smaller, more manageable elements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If users gather comprehensive information about multiple alternatives, then they can make informed decisions, but the time required for research increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of purchasing decisionVSAvoidtime spent on research
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically detecting when users are researching alternatives and proactively creating research notes before the user has to manually organize everything. This early intervention captures relevant information while it's still being gathered, reducing the overall time needed for comprehensive research

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback mechanisms that help users prioritize information and factors based on what other users consider important. This feedback loop allows users to focus their research on the most relevant aspects, reducing time spent on less important details while maintaining decision quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of information

If users mentally store and compare information about alternatives, then they can quickly access data, but information loss and distortion occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of stored informationVSAvoidstructure of information storage
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates structured digital copies of user research data, storing information about alternatives, factors, and comparisons in an organized format. This external copying prevents information loss and distortion that occurs with mental storage, while the structured format maintains clarity and accessibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS8660910B1System for enabling electronic catalog users to create and share research data
Publication Date: 2014.02.25 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US8660910B1 patent drawing
  • US8660910B1 patent drawing
  • US8660910B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Comparative decision systems and methods are disclosed for gathering and mining data representative of purchase decisions. One disclosed comparative decision system detects when a user is comparing items and provides the user with the ability to create a research note storing comparative information for the alternative items. The system displays information about items according to a variety of factors. The user can customize the factors and enter information for each alternative item according to the various factors. Some information may be pre-populated by the system. The research note may be made visible to other users, and may be suggested to another user based on the note's expected helpfulness and relevance to that user. One disclosed method for mining data stored within research notes identifies which factors are given higher relative priorities by users considering a purchase. Another mining method analyzes the effects of price changes on item popularity.