Deep Reservoir Fracture Prediction Using Thickness Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for predicting deep reservoir structural fractures are inadequate as they fail to account for reservoir thickness changes, leading to inaccurate predictions and low reliability, especially in unconventional energy sources requiring high precision.

Innovation Solution

A method that introduces a stress-based prediction formula group and a thickness-based optimization formula, classifying reservoir thickness units and using measurement and simulation data to calculate structural fracture linear density, with reliability analysis to improve prediction accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If stress-based prediction formula group is used, then prediction method is established, but prediction accuracy is insufficient and does not account for thickness changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction reliabilityVSAvoidprediction precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the prediction approach by changing the parameter set from stress-only parameters to include thickness parameters. The optimization formula introduces thickness (h) as a key parameter, transforming the prediction from D′lf = f(σ, E, μ) to D′lf = f(σ, E, μ, h), thereby improving prediction precision while maintaining the stress-based foundation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds a new dimension to the prediction model by incorporating thickness variation. Instead of considering only stress parameters in a two-dimensional parameter space, the model extends to three dimensions by including thickness as an additional parameter, enabling the prediction to account for vertical variations in reservoir geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If conventional stress-based method is used, then prediction process is simple, but cannot explain correlation between thickness change and fracture distribution

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction simplicityVSAvoidthickness-fracture correlation information
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the reservoir into multiple thickness units (h1, h2, h3, ...) and applies the prediction formula to each segment independently. This segmentation allows the model to capture local thickness variations and their corresponding fracture density patterns, preserving the thickness-fracture correlation information that would be lost in a uniform thickness assumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic adaptation by allowing the prediction model to adjust to varying thickness conditions. The optimization formula dynamically incorporates thickness parameter h, enabling the model to adapt its predictions based on the specific thickness characteristics of each reservoir segment, thereby maintaining operational simplicity while capturing thickness-fracture correlations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If current prediction method is used, then prediction can be performed, but reliability of prediction results cannot be predicted and special lithology areas cannot be avoided

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction capabilityVSAvoidprediction result reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary classification of reservoir thickness units before applying the prediction formula. By pre-segmenting the reservoir into thickness units and identifying areas with significant thickness variations or special lithology, the model can apply appropriate prediction strategies to different zones, improving the reliability of prediction results while maintaining overall productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates a feedback mechanism through the optimization process. The model uses measured data and simulation results to refine the thickness parameter h and improve prediction accuracy. This feedback loop allows the system to learn from prediction errors and adjust accordingly, enhancing reliability while preserving the core prediction capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240386163A1Method for Simulating and Predicting Deep Reservoir Structural Fractures in Consideration of Thickness Change
Publication Date: 2024.11.21 SHANXI HUAYANG GROUP NEW ENERGY CO LTD NO 1 MINE
  • US20240386163A1 patent drawing
  • US20240386163A1 patent drawing
  • US20240386163A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for simulating and predicting deep reservoir structural fractures in consideration of thickness change is disclosed. The method firstly calculates a structural fracture apparent density by using a stress-based reservoir structural fracture prediction formula group, secondly obtains structural fracture linear density based on simulation experiment, thickness unit division and reservoir structural fracture prediction optimization formula, finally carries out a reliability judgment based on the structural fracture linear density, the apparent density and the measured inspection values by using parameter inspection and error analysis. The above method can effectively reduce the difficulty and cost of energy development.