Reservoir Property Model Seismic Inversion Error Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for seismic inversion struggle to accurately determine reservoir property values and locations, leading to unreliable reservoir management decisions due to low correlation between seismic inversion products and well-path rock properties, necessitating a robust measure of seismic quality to differentiate deterministic and stochastic regions.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that compute seismic inversion error using moving-window correlation and machine learning techniques, such as k-nearest neighbors with principal component analysis, to generate a reservoir property model by assessing seismic inversion quality, allowing for geophysical constraints in deterministic regions and stochastic modeling in uncertain areas.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If seismic inversion products are calibrated to well control, then reservoir property values can be determined, but the correlation with well-path rock properties is too low to reliably influence reservoir management decisions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseismic inversion accuracyVSAvoidreservoir management decision reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary quality metric that mediates between seismic inversion products and reservoir management decisions. This metric acts as a filter or gatekeeper, determining which inversion results are reliable enough to influence decisions. The quality metric is computed by comparing inversion results across multiple realizations and thresholding the variance, thereby introducing a mediating layer that resolves the low correlation issue by selectively accepting or rejecting inversion outputs based on their computed quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If seismic inversion is performed without quality assessment, then reservoir property models can be built quickly, but the models lack reliability for optimizing hydrocarbon production

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodeling speedVSAvoidproduction optimization reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by computing the quality metric before the reservoir property model is finalized or used for decision-making. The quality assessment is performed in advance on the inversion products, allowing the modeling workflow to proceed efficiently while ensuring that only quality-assessed results are used for optimization. This preliminary quality check prevents unreliable models from being built, thereby maintaining both productivity and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Stability of the object's composition

If deterministic modeling is applied throughout the reservoir, then consistent property values are obtained, but stochastic regions with poor seismic quality cannot be adequately represented

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproperty model consistencyVSAvoidmodeling approach flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by allowing different modeling approaches (deterministic or stochastic) to be applied to different regions of the reservoir based on locally computed quality metrics. High-quality regions use deterministic modeling for consistency, while low-quality regions use stochastic modeling to account for uncertainty. This spatially varying approach resolves the contradiction by making the modeling strategy adaptive to local conditions rather than uniformly applied.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Measurement precision

If cross-validation is performed to verify inversion quality, then model accuracy can be assessed, but computational time and complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinversion quality assessment accuracyVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by performing cross-validation in a simplified or reduced form rather than exhaustive cross-validation. The quality metric computation uses a practical approximation that provides sufficient accuracy for reservoir management decisions without the full computational burden of complete cross-validation. This partial validation approach maintains acceptable precision while significantly reducing computational time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP4004607B1System and method for building reservoir property models
Publication Date: 2023.09.27 CHEVRON USA INC
  • EP4004607B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4004607B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4004607B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method is described for generating a reservoir property model based on the quality of a seismic inversion product. The method may include receiving a seismic inversion product volume, a seismic attribute volume, and well data from wells drilled in a subsurface volume of interest; identifying collocated cells in the seismic volumes which correspond to the well data; creating attribute vectors from the seismic volumes in each of the collocated cells and a range of neighboring cells; calculating a seismic inversion error magnitude property at the collocated cells; training a data analytics method to predict the observed seismic inversion error magnitude property; verifying that the data analytics method accurately predicts the seismic inversion error magnitude using cross-validation; generating an inversion quality volume; and generating the reservoir property model based on the inversion quality volume. The method may be executed by a computer system.