Reservoir Transfer Control With Flood Simulation Safeguards

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Increasing drought frequency, intensity, and duration in states like Texas due to population growth, lag in permitting new lakes, zebra mussel invasions, and siltation lead to degraded dams that require costly rehabilitation or decommissioning, with existing water management systems failing to efficiently manage water flow and prevent flooding.

Innovation Solution

A water supply control system that interconnects non-water supply lakes with water supply lakes using pipes and gates, employing a computer-implemented control system with sensors and reservoir simulation modeling to manage water flow, ensuring it does not cause or worsen flooding, and implementing safety controls for unmanned operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If water is transferred from non-water supply lakes to water supply lakes using existing dams and pipes, then water supply efficiency is improved, but flood risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater supply efficiencyVSAvoidflood risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary flood risk assessment through reservoir simulation modeling before executing water transfer operations. The control system evaluates potential flood conditions in advance by modeling various water transfer scenarios and only proceeds with transfers that will not cause or worsen flooding events, thus preventing harmful effects before they occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors water levels, flow rates, and reservoir conditions using sensors throughout the water transfer network. This real-time feedback is fed back to the control system, which adjusts gate positions and pump operations dynamically to maintain safe operating conditions while maximizing water supply efficiency, preventing flooding by responding to changing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If automated control systems are implemented for unmanned dam operation, then operational safety is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational safetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system operates autonomously without requiring human operators at dam sites. It self-manages water transfer operations by automatically interpreting sensor data, running simulations to assess flood risk, controlling gates and pumps, and adjusting operations based on real-time conditions. This self-service capability ensures consistent safety protocols are followed while reducing operational complexity through automation rather than human intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical operations with automated electronic control. Physical gate operations and pump controls that previously required human operators are substituted with electronic actuators controlled by the automated system, which uses sensors and simulation models to make decisions. This substitution improves reliability through consistent automated execution while managing complexity through integrated software control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If reservoir simulation modeling is used to assess flood risk, then decision accuracy is improved, but computational time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflood risk assessment accuracyVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-establishes simulation models and threshold criteria for flood risk assessment before operational decisions are needed. By having the modeling framework and evaluation criteria prepared in advance, the system can quickly assess whether proposed water transfers will cause flooding without performing full complex simulations in real-time, thus maintaining high accuracy while reducing computational time for operational decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively manages water flow between lakes, preventing flooding and dam damage while reducing rehabilitation costs by leveraging existing dams and non-water supply lakes, providing a timely and efficient water supply solution.

Implementation Method 1

a plurality of pipes adapted to transfer water between the plurality of non-water supply lakes and one or more water supply lakes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitational flow: Gravitation

Implementation Method 2

one or more pumps adapted to pump water through a corresponding one or more of the plurality of pipes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPumping: Pump

Implementation Method 3

The plurality of gates are adapted to adjust an amount of water flow through the plurality of pipes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow control: Valve

Data Source

PatentUS12116740B1Water supply control system that implements safety controls and uses simulation to prevent commands that would cause or worsen flooding
Publication Date: 2024.10.15 OBRIEN ENGINEERING INC
  • US12116740B1 patent drawing
  • US12116740B1 patent drawing
  • US12116740B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A water supply control system is disclosed that comprises a computer-implemented control system coupled to a plurality of gates, one or more pumps, and a plurality of sensors. The computer-implemented control system is configured to receive a request to transfer excess water from a non-water supply lake to a water supply lake and determine, based at least in part on data from the plurality of sensors and geographic locations of the non-water supply lake and the water supply lake, whether transferring water as requested will cause or worsen a flood event. In response to a determination that transferring water as requested will not cause or worsen a flood event, the computer-implemented control system is further configured to issue a command to cause a gate associated with a dam at the non-water supply lake to open such that water is transferred from the non-water supply lake to the water supply lake.