Residual Coefficient Decoding With Adaptive Rice Parameter Mapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing video coding technologies face challenges in efficiently encoding and decoding high-definition and ultra-high-definition video data while maintaining image quality, particularly in the compression and decompression of residual and coefficient data.

Innovation Solution

Implementations include decoding video data by receiving syntax elements and converting codewords into pixel parameters using a predefined mapping relationship, determining a Rice parameter, and applying sign values to quantified pixel values, enhancing the efficiency of residual and coefficient coding processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If video compression uses traditional residual and coefficient coding methods, then the coding process is simple, but the compression efficiency is insufficient for high-definition and ultra-high-definition video data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompression efficiencyVSAvoidcoding process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the coefficient coding process into multiple stages: first coding the sign bits of coefficients, then coding the absolute values using Rice coding with adaptive parameters, and finally coding the precision information. This segmentation allows each stage to optimize for specific characteristics of the data, improving overall compression efficiency while maintaining manageable complexity through structured processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic Rice parameter selection based on the quantization parameter and coefficient characteristics. The Rice parameter is not fixed but adapts dynamically during the coding process to match the statistical properties of the residual data, enabling optimal compression efficiency for different video content and quality requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 3:

The patent changes multiple coding parameters including Rice parameters, quantization parameters, and precision levels based on the characteristics of the residual data and desired output quality. These parameter changes allow the system to optimize compression efficiency for high-definition and ultra-high-definition video while maintaining flexibility for different application scenarios

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Quantity of substance

If the video data is compressed to reduce data volume, then the data size decreases, but the image quality may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata volumeVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by selectively coding only the significant coefficients and using variable precision for different coefficient values. Instead of uniformly processing all coefficients with the same precision, the system applies higher precision only where needed, reducing data volume while maintaining image quality in critical regions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter changes by adjusting the Rice parameter and quantization level dynamically based on the importance and characteristics of each coefficient. This allows the system to optimize the balance between compression ratio and image quality by applying different coding parameters to different coefficients, achieving high compression efficiency while preserving visual quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If traditional coding methods are used for residual data, then the decoding process is straightforward, but the coding efficiency does not meet the requirements for high-definition video

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoding efficiencyVSAvoiddecoding complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-calculating and storing Rice parameter tables during the encoding process. These pre-computed parameters are then directly retrieved and applied during decoding, eliminating the need for complex real-time calculations at the decoder and significantly simplifying the decoding process while maintaining high coding efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the encoder analyzes the statistical properties of the residual data and adjusts the Rice parameters accordingly. This feedback information is embedded in the bitstream, allowing the decoder to use the same adaptive parameters for efficient decoding without requiring complex analysis, thus improving coding efficiency while keeping decoding straightforward

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20260052277A1Methods and apparatus of residual and coefficient coding
Publication Date: 2026.02.19 BEIJING DAJIA INTERNET INFORMATION TECH CO LTD
  • US20260052277A1 patent drawing
  • US20260052277A1 patent drawing
  • US20260052277A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An electronic apparatus performs a method of decoding video data. The method comprises: receiving, from bitstream, one or more syntax elements and video data corresponding to a coding unit; determining a Rice parameter according to the one or more syntax elements; decoding, from the video data, a first codeword and a second codeword for a pixel within the coding unit; converting the first codeword into a parameter of the pixel in accordance with a predefined mapping relationship that is generated using the determined Rice parameter; converting the second codeword into a sign value of the parameter; and determining a quantified pixel value of the pixel based on the parameter and the sign value.