Residual Value Forecasting Using Multi-Dimensional Data Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for determining the future value of durable goods, such as vehicles, are inaccurate and rely on simplistic, backward-looking data, making it difficult for companies to predict resale values and make informed business decisions.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for forecasting residual values using a sophisticated algorithm that incorporates microeconomic, macroeconomic, and competitive set data, allowing for dynamic adaptation to changing inputs and providing accurate, reliable forecasts across the lifecycle of durable goods.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional methods using backward-looking data are used, then the system complexity is low, but the forecast accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforecast accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the forecasting system into multiple independent modules: data collection module (gathering microeconomic, macroeconomic, and competitive set data), algorithm processing module (applying the forecasting algorithm), and output generation module (producing residual value forecasts). This segmentation allows each module to handle specific tasks independently, improving overall accuracy while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from one-dimensional backward-looking data analysis to multi-dimensional forecasting by incorporating microeconomic factors, macroeconomic factors, and competitive set data simultaneously. This dimensional expansion enables the system to capture complex market dynamics and produce accurate forward-looking forecasts that conventional single-dimension methods cannot achieve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If conventional backward-looking methods are used, then the data requirements are minimal, but the reliability of value determination deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalue determination reliabilityVSAvoiddata requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple data sources and factor types into a unified forecasting model: microeconomic data (specific to the item and industry), macroeconomic data (general economic conditions), and competitive set data (comparable items). This merging of diverse data streams provides comprehensive input for the algorithm, significantly improving the reliability of value determination while the systematic organization of data requirements keeps the quantity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the forecasting algorithm processes the combined data and generates residual value estimates, which can then be validated and refined. The ability to review and adjust forecasts based on actual market conditions and performance data enhances reliability, allowing the system to learn from past predictions and improve future accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If simplistic resale value methods are used, then the ease of operation is high, but the productivity of business decision-making deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision-making efficiencyVSAvoidoperation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The forecasting system is designed to be self-service through automated data collection, processing, and forecast generation. The algorithm automatically processes microeconomic, macroeconomic, and competitive set data without requiring manual intervention, producing ready-to-use residual value forecasts that directly enhance business decision-making productivity while maintaining ease of operation through automated functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts forecasting parameters and data weights based on changing market conditions and data availability. This adaptability allows the system to maintain high productivity in decision-making by providing up-to-date, relevant forecasts while automatically optimizing its operation based on current economic and market parameters without requiring manual reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11257101B2System, method and computer program for improved forecasting residual values of a durable good over time
Publication Date: 2022.02.22 J D POWER
  • US11257101B2 patent drawing
  • US11257101B2 patent drawing
  • US11257101B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A residual value forecasting system may utilize heterogeneous data, such as used market data, industry-specific data, and non-industry-specific data, from disparate data sources to produce residual value forecasts of an item based on a sophisticated residual value forecasting model particularly configured for agility. The system can dynamically and quickly adapt to change in data inputs and produce custom outputs. The system may determine a baseline value for an item using the used market data, a microeconomic factor using the industry-specific data, and a macroeconomic factor using the non-industry-specific data, as well as adjustments such as locality adjustments and modifications. Given the macroeconomic factor and the microeconomic factor relative to the locality-adjusted value of the item and in view of the competitive sets of similar and/or substitute items in the same industry, the system can generate an accurate forecast residual value of the item at a future time point.