Residue Distribution Sensitivity Control for Variable Harvest Conditions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Agricultural work machines, such as harvesters, face challenges in monitoring and controlling residue distribution due to environmental variability, leading to over-reactions and adverse harvest conditions.

Innovation Solution

A system that monitors real-time operational conditions and adjusts the sensitivity of residue distribution systems to maintain stable performance by dynamically adjusting operational parameters based on environmental variability, using sensors and a control unit to manage sensitivity levels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If active residue monitoring systems continuously adjust residue distribution based on real-time conditions, then residue distribution quality is improved, but system over-reaction and overcompensation occur leading to additional adverse harvest conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresidue distribution qualityVSAvoidadverse harvest conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the sensitivity parameter based on measured environmental variability. When environmental conditions are stable, the system uses higher sensitivity for precise residue distribution control. When environmental variability increases, the system automatically reduces sensitivity to prevent over-reaction and overcompensation, thus resolving the contradiction between distribution quality and adverse conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If the residue monitoring system increases control sensitivity to respond to environmental changes, then adaptation to changing conditions is improved, but system stability deteriorates due to over-adjustments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptation to environmental changesVSAvoidsystem stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the sensitivity parameter based on measured environmental variability. The controller measures environmental conditions over time, calculates variability metrics, and adjusts the sensitivity parameter accordingly. This allows the system to adapt to changing environmental conditions while maintaining stability by reducing sensitivity when variability is high.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If the system makes frequent adjustments to accommodate changing environmental conditions, then residue distribution accuracy is improved, but operational stability worsens due to quick adjustments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresidue distribution accuracyVSAvoidoperational stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts sensitivity based on environmental variability measurements. When environmental conditions are stable, the system allows frequent adjustments for high accuracy. When environmental variability increases, the system reduces sensitivity to limit the frequency and magnitude of adjustments, thereby maintaining operational stability while still achieving acceptable distribution accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20260013438A1Systems and methods for controlling agricultural work machine sensitivity
Publication Date: 2026.01.15 DEERE & CO
  • US20260013438A1 patent drawing
  • US20260013438A1 patent drawing
  • US20260013438A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An agricultural system includes one or more processors and memory storing instructions executable by the one or more processors. The instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, configure the agricultural system to: monitor a performance parameter of an agricultural work machine at a worksite; monitor one or more operational environment conditions relative to the worksite; determine a sensitivity with which to control the agricultural work machine based, at least, on the one or more operational environment conditions; and control the agricultural work machine based, at least, on the sensitivity.