Resiliency Algorithm for Leadership Development

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for developing leadership within organizations fail to effectively account for the impact of employee health on leadership potential, leading to overlooked candidates who may be better suited for leadership positions due to their health status.

Innovation Solution

A system that utilizes a resilience algorithm to assess employee health and performance data, including interactive health surveys, health-sensing devices, and virtual reality functional performance tests, to generate a resiliency score that identifies and ranks potential leaders, and provides dashboards for employees and employers to track and improve leadership development.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional leadership identification systems (annual evaluations) are used, then some leadership candidates are identified, but employee health status is not considered leading to overlooked candidates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleadership identification accuracyVSAvoidhealth status information
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines traditional leadership evaluation systems with health assessment systems into a unified leadership development platform. The system merges performance data, health status data, and resiliency metrics to create a comprehensive leadership identification approach that captures both professional capabilities and health-related leadership potential.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a resiliency algorithm as an intermediary that processes health status information and translates it into leadership potential metrics. This intermediary component bridges the gap between health data and leadership evaluation, enabling health status to inform leadership identification without directly replacing traditional evaluation methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive health and performance data collection is implemented, then leadership identification accuracy improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleadership assessment accuracyVSAvoiddata collection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs health sensors and data collection devices that serve multiple functions: monitoring physical health metrics, assessing resiliency, evaluating leadership potential, and tracking employee wellness. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate specialized systems while maintaining comprehensive data collection capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms complex health and performance data into simplified resiliency scores and leadership metrics through algorithmic processing. By changing the parameters from raw multifaceted data to standardized scores, the system maintains measurement precision while reducing the apparent complexity for end users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If health status is used as a criterion for leadership selection, then effective leaders are identified, but discrimination against less healthy employees may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleadership effectivenessVSAvoidemployee discrimination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses health status as one partial factor among multiple criteria in the leadership identification process rather than as a decisive or excessive factor. The resiliency algorithm considers health metrics alongside performance data, skills assessments, and other leadership-relevant factors, ensuring health information informs but does not dominate the evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different weights and considerations to health status depending on the specific leadership role and context. Rather than applying a uniform health threshold to all employees, the system tailors the importance of health metrics to the specific demands of different leadership positions and individual employee circumstances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10628770B2Systems and methods for acquiring and employing resiliency data for leadership development
Publication Date: 2020.04.21 SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO
  • US10628770B2 patent drawing
  • US10628770B2 patent drawing
  • US10628770B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided in some embodiments are systems and methods for acquiring and employing resiliency data for leadership development. Provided in some embodiments is a method that includes acquiring a set of resiliency data for an employee, determining a resiliency score for the employee based at least in part on the set of resiliency data, determining that the employee is recommended for promotion to a leadership position within an organization based at least in part on the resiliency score, determining a ranking of the employee relative to other employees within the organization based at least in part on the resiliency score, and serving, to a first device for display to the employee, an employee leadership review dashboard including an indication of the resiliency score for the employee, and an indication of the ranking of the employee relative to the other employees.