Resilient Backing Tooling for Precise Incremental Sheet Forming

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sheet metal forming technologies face challenges in efficiently forming complex shapes without the need for expensive and time-consuming die manufacturing, particularly in low-volume production and prototype development, as they often result in defects like wrinkling and tearing due to inadequate force control.

Innovation Solution

A dual-sided incremental sheet forming method using a primary rigid tool and a secondary resilient tool that applies localized forces to the sheet material, allowing for precise control of stress and formation without the need for purpose-built dies, enabling the creation of asymmetric and complex shapes with reduced power consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional stamping technology with rigid dies is used, then manufacturing precision and reliability are improved, but device complexity and manufacturing cost increase due to the need for expensive purpose-built dies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforming precisionVSAvoiddie complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a rigid master die to create a resilient backup die that copies the master die's shape and forming characteristics. This allows the system to achieve precision comparable to traditional rigid die stamping while avoiding the need to manufacture multiple expensive rigid dies for different parts. The resilient die acts as a reusable copy that can be rapidly produced through casting or molding processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical state and properties of the backup die from rigid to resilient by using elastomeric or viscoelastic materials. This parameter change allows the backup die to deform elastically during forming operations, absorbing stress concentrations and preventing defects while maintaining forming precision. The resilient material properties can be tuned to match specific forming requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If traditional stamping technology with rigid dies is used, then manufacturing precision is improved, but loss of time increases due to the long lead times required for die manufacturing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforming precisionVSAvoiddie manufacturing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a master die with the precise forming geometry in advance, then uses it to produce resilient backup dies through rapid casting or molding processes. This preliminary action allows the system to achieve high forming precision while dramatically reducing the time required to produce tooling for low-volume production. The master die can be reused to create multiple backup dies as needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The resilient backup die is created as a copy of the master die through rapid prototyping, casting, or molding techniques. This copying process takes fractions of the time required to machine a traditional rigid die, enabling quick tooling production for prototypes and low-volume runs while maintaining the precision geometry of the original master die design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Device complexity

If single-sided incremental sheet forming is used, then device complexity is reduced by eliminating the need for backed material or fluid pressure systems, but object-generated harmful factors increase due to wrinkling and tearing defects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforming system complexityVSAvoidforming defects
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a resilient backup die as an intermediary element between the rigid master die and the workpiece. This resilient intermediate layer mediates the force transmission during forming, distributing stresses evenly and preventing the wrinkling and tearing defects that occur in single-sided forming. The backup die acts as a cushion that maintains uniform contact pressure across the forming zone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a composite tooling system combining rigid master die material (for precision geometry) with resilient backup die material (for stress distribution). This composite approach leverages the advantages of both rigid and flexible materials, achieving defect-free forming while maintaining system simplicity and avoiding complex fluid pressure or backing material systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Object-generated harmful factors

If dual-sided incremental sheet forming with opposed rigid tools is used, then object-generated harmful factors are reduced by applying force from both sides, but device complexity and loss of time increase due to the need to coordinate paths of multiple tools

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforming defectsVSAvoidtool coordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs an asymmetric dual-sided forming configuration where a rigid master die provides the primary forming action on one side, while a resilient backup die provides support on the opposite side. This asymmetric arrangement eliminates the need to coordinate the paths of two rigid tools, as the resilient backup die naturally conforms to the workpiece and master die interface, simplifying the control system while still providing dual-sided force application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The resilient backup die serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides counter-force during forming, supports the workpiece, distributes stresses uniformly, and adapts to varying forming geometries. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for complex coordination systems required in traditional dual-sided rigid tool forming, as the resilient material inherently adjusts to maintain optimal forming conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method allows for the efficient formation of complex and asymmetric shapes with improved precision and reduced defects, eliminating the need for expensive die manufacturing and minimizing power usage, thus facilitating low-volume production and prototype development.

Implementation Method 1

a secondary resilient tool assembly having a resilient layer secured to a rigid backing and positioned adjacent to and facing the second surface of the work piece and capable of moving into and out of engagement with the work piece

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS11819898B2Incremental sheet forming system with resilient tooling
Publication Date: 2023.11.21 FIGUR MACHINE TOOLS LLC
  • US11819898B2 patent drawing
  • US11819898B2 patent drawing
  • US11819898B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention is directed to a dual sided incremental sheet forming apparatus and method for incrementally forming sheet materials such as sheet metal by utilizing opposed primary and secondary forming tool assemblies and a sheet feeding assembly. The primary forming tool assembly includes a rigid tool and the secondary forming tool assembly includes a compressible and resilient backing layer having either a cylindrical or flat configuration. The sheet feeding assembly positions the sheet material between the two forming tools. The rigid tool applies force to one surface of the sheet material while the resilient backing tool applies counter force to the opposite surface of the work piece as it supports the work piece. This dual sided process localizes the forces on the sheet material so that stresses are advantageously controlled to produce accurately formed asymmetric shapes, without the need for expensive dies. The use of a rigid tool with an opposed resilient backing tool both having linear independent motion also avoids potential wrinkling and tearing of the resulting work piece and enables the formation of numerous, highly detained asymmetric products.