Resilient Closing Wheel System for Variable Soil Conditions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing trench closing systems in planters and drills are not agronomically optimal due to dependence on environmental and operational factors such as soil moisture, particle composition, and planting speed, leading to suboptimal effectiveness.

Innovation Solution

An improved closing system for planters and drills, featuring a disc assembly and closing wheel assembly with adjustable components, including support arms, discs, and closing wheels, that can resiliently engage and close trenches effectively across varying soil conditions, with a finishing assembly to smooth the soil, and optional liquid application features.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional closing systems are used, then the system structure is simple, but the trench closing effectiveness is suboptimal under varying soil conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrench closing effectivenessVSAvoidclosing system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The closing system employs resilient closing wheels that can dynamically adapt to varying soil conditions. The closing wheels are mounted on resilient arms that allow independent movement and adjustment, enabling the system to maintain effective trench closure across different soil moisture, particle composition, and density conditions without requiring complex active control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows adjustment of closing wheel downforce and positioning parameters to optimize performance for different soil types and planting conditions. By modifying physical parameters such as wheel position, downforce, and resilient arm characteristics, the system achieves improved reliability without requiring complete structural redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If fixed closing system components are used, then the device complexity is low, but the adaptability to different soil conditions is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to soil conditionsVSAvoidadjustable components
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The closing wheels are mounted on resilient arms that enable independent movement and positioning, allowing each wheel to adapt to local soil variations. This dynamic configuration provides versatility across different soil conditions while maintaining a relatively simple structure through passive adaptation rather than active control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The resilient arm mechanism serves multiple functions: it provides structural support for the closing wheels, enables adaptation to varying soil conditions, allows for downforce adjustment, and accommodates different planting depths. This multi-functionality achieves broad adaptability without proportionally increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If non-resilient closing wheels are used, then the manufacturing is simpler, but the effectiveness under varying operational factors is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosing effectivenessVSAvoidresilient engagement mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The resilient arms providing flexible mounting for the closing wheels can be manufactured using conventional fabrication methods while still delivering dynamic adaptation. The resilience is achieved through material selection and geometric design rather than complex mechanisms, maintaining ease of manufacture while improving reliability under varying operational conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Manufacturing precision

If single-point closing is used, then the device complexity is low, but the soil closure quality is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoil closure qualityVSAvoidclosing wheel assembly
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The closing system divides the closing function into multiple closing wheels that can independently engage different portions of the trench. This segmentation allows each wheel to optimize its engagement with the soil, improving overall closure quality through distributed action rather than concentrated force from a single closing point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11895943B2Planting trench closing systems, methods, and apparatus
Publication Date: 2024.02.13 PRECISION PLANTING LLC
  • US11895943B2 patent drawing
  • US11895943B2 patent drawing
  • US11895943B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and apparatus for closing a planting trench include a disc assembly for loosening soil adjacent to the planting trench. In some embodiments a closing wheel assembly has a subframe, a vertical pivot mounting the closing wheel subframe to a row unit subframe, and a air of pivot arms. The closing wheel subframe pivots relative to the subframe of the row unit.