Resilient Mold Insert for Concrete Block Release

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Concrete blocks with irregular surfaces, such as those mimicking natural stone, are difficult to release from conventional molds due to their textured and undercut designs, requiring significant manual labor and increasing manufacturing costs.

Innovation Solution

A mold apparatus with a rigid support and a resilient insert that includes flexible webbing or straps to allow the insert to move relative to the support, enabling easy release of the concrete block by inverting or lifting the support, allowing the insert to deform and separate from the block.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional rigid molds are used to cast concrete blocks with irregular surfaces, then the block surfaces can achieve the desired natural stone appearance, but the blocks become difficult to release from the mold requiring significant manual labor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface irregularityVSAvoidblock release
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The mold is divided into two functional parts: a rigid support structure that maintains overall mold shape and a resilient insert that forms the block surface. This segmentation allows the rigid portion to provide structural stability while the resilient insert provides easy release capability through its elastic properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mold material transitions from completely rigid to resilient/elastic. The resilient insert can deform under the weight of the concrete block during casting, then spring back to release the block after curing, automatically adapting to the block's weight and shape without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If manual disassembly of form walls is used to release blocks, then blocks with irregular surfaces can be removed, but the manual labor required increases manufacturing costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblock removalVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The resilient insert automatically performs the release function through its elastic properties. When the cured block is placed on the insert, the insert deforms under the block's weight and then springs back, automatically releasing the block without requiring any manual disassembly or intervention, thereby reducing labor costs and increasing productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The mold transitions from a static rigid structure to a dynamic resilient system that can deform and spring back. This dynamic behavior allows the mold to adapt to the block's weight and automatically release it, eliminating the need for manual disassembly operations and improving manufacturing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If form walls are hinged to pivot away from the block, then blocks with undercuts can be released, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveform wall releaseVSAvoidhinged mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The release function is extracted from the rigid support structure and assigned to a separate resilient insert. This allows the main support structure to remain simple and stable while the insert provides the necessary elastic deformation capability for automatic block release, reducing overall device complexity compared to hinged mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Facilitates the efficient removal and reuse of molds for casting concrete blocks with complex shapes, reducing manual labor and manufacturing costs while enabling the production of large and small blocks with intricate surface patterns.

Implementation Method 1

The weight of the block causes the resilient insert to deform and pull away from sides of the block, allowing the block to fall freely from the insert

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

One or more areas of the insert are loosely secured to the support so that when the support is inverted, the insert will drop a short distance from the support or when the block is lifted the insert can lift a short distance above the support

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlexibility: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS7687006B2Form for casting concrete blocks and other objects
Publication Date: 2010.03.30 ROSETTA HARDSCAPES LLC
  • US7687006B2 patent drawing
  • US7687006B2 patent drawing
  • US7687006B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A form for casting concrete blocks and other products having a resilient insert defining a cavity in which the block is cast and a rigid support or frame for the resilient insert. After the block has cured, the block is removed from the insert either by inverting the form to allow the block to fall from the insert or by lifting the block from the insert. One or more areas of the insert are tethered to the support with at least one generally flat flexible strap so that at least a portion of the insert is allowed to move a limited distance relative to the support and to deform to release the block. One end of each tether strap is embedded in the insert. After the cast block is separated from the insert, the insert is returned to a position wherein it is supported for casting another block.