Resilient Prosthetic Foot Kickback Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Prosthetic feet currently do not effectively replicate the action of a real foot, leading to 'kickback' or 'kickforward' reactions that increase the risk of injury to amputees, especially when encountering obstacles like door jams.

Innovation Solution

A prosthetic foot design featuring a ground-engaging bottom resilient member, a heel resilient member, and a toe resilient member, which deflect and distribute compressive forces to minimize 'kickback' by absorbing impact and allowing smooth traversal over raised surfaces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a traditional rigid prosthetic foot structure is used, then structural strength is maintained, but kickback forces are generated that increase injury risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinjury risk reductionVSAvoidkickback forces
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The prosthetic foot is divided into multiple resilient members (bottom member, heel member, toe member) that can independently deflect and absorb energy. This segmentation allows each component to handle specific forces during the gait cycle, reducing overall kickback forces while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The resilient members are pre-configured with elastic properties to absorb impact forces before they can generate harmful kickback reactions. The bottom resilient member and heel resilient member act as cushioning elements that deform under compression, dissipating energy that would otherwise be transmitted back to the user's leg.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

2Object-generated harmful factors

If a resilient multi-member structure is used, then kickback forces are minimized, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvekickback forcesVSAvoidnumber of resilient members
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple resilient members (bottom member, heel member, toe member) are combined into a single integrated prosthetic foot assembly that works together as a unified system. The members are connected in a way that their combined elastic deformation provides the kickback-reducing effect while presenting a compact, cohesive structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The resilient members function as flexible elastic structures that deform under load. These flexible components replace rigid structural elements, allowing the foot to adapt to terrain and absorb impacts through elastic deformation rather than requiring complex mechanical joints or actuators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

3Ease of operation

If traditional prosthetic feet are used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but natural gait replication is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenatural gait replicationVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The resilient members are designed with specific elastic parameters (modulus of elasticity, cross-sectional geometry, length) that can be adjusted to replicate the mechanical properties of a human foot. By changing these physical parameters of the elastic materials, the prosthetic foot can be tuned to match natural gait characteristics without requiring complex control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design reduces the risk of injury by minimizing 'kickback' forces and providing a more natural gait, allowing amputees to walk over obstacles without rearward leg force, enhancing safety and comfort.

Implementation Method 1

a ground engaging bottom resilient member having a front end and a back end and an intermediate section spanning between and connecting the front end and the back end; a heel resilient member having a rear end connected to the back end of the bottom resilient member, extending upwardly from the back end

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

when the compressive applied force compresses said prosthetic foot against the ground the intermediate section of the bottom member upwardly deflects from the ground

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact absorption: Impact Force

Data Source

PatentUS8048173B2Prosthetic foot
Publication Date: 2011.11.01 PROTEOR USA LLC
  • US8048173B2 patent drawing
  • US8048173B2 patent drawing
  • US8048173B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A prosthetic foot comprises a ground engaging bottom resilient member, a resilient heel member, and a resilient toe member that collectively circumscribe an open volumetric space. The members resilient compress to absorb compressive force throughout the entire stride of an individual utilizing the foot.