Resilient Mounting for Low-Ductility Turbine Shroud

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Low-ductility materials like ceramic matrix composites (CMCs) used in gas turbine engine shrouds experience differential thermal expansion issues, leading to overconstraint, overloads, and loss of preload due to their different thermal expansion coefficients compared to metallic hardware, necessitating a resilient mounting solution.

Innovation Solution

A resilient mounting apparatus using spring elements, such as wave springs and W-seals, between low-ductility turbine shroud segments and metallic structures to maintain axial position and accommodate thermal expansion, ensuring proper sealing and preload.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If rigid metallic mounting structures are used to securely position CMC shroud segments, then the shroud segments are firmly held in position, but differential thermal expansion causes overconstraint, overloads, and loss of preload

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecure positioning of shroud segmentsVSAvoidpreload on shroud segments
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The mounting structure changes from rigid to compliant by introducing spring elements that can deflect axially. This parameter change allows the structure to accommodate thermal expansion while maintaining secure positioning and preventing overconstraint and preload loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Spring elements are introduced as intermediary components between the rigid metallic mounting structure and the CMC shroud segments. These intermediaries absorb thermal expansion differences through elastic deformation, preventing direct transmission of thermal stresses to the shroud segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If rigid mounting structures are used to maintain axial position, then positioning is precise, but thermal expansion differences cause overconstraint and overloads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaxial positioning accuracyVSAvoidthermal expansion stress
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The mounting structure transitions from a static rigid connection to a dynamic compliant connection using spring elements. These springs can deflect axially to accommodate thermal expansion while maintaining precise positioning, converting the static constraint into a dynamic adaptive system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The structural stiffness parameter is changed by introducing compliant spring elements. This allows the mounting structure to maintain positioning accuracy while changing from a rigid constraint to a flexible accommodation of thermal dimensional changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If friction-based axial positioning is used, then simple mounting is achieved, but reliance on friction is insufficient to prevent preload loss under thermal loading

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemounting structure simplicityVSAvoidpreload maintenance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The friction-based mechanical positioning system is replaced with a spring-based elastic constraint system. The springs provide active axial constraint forces that are more reliable than friction, maintaining preload under thermal loading while adding minimal complexity to the mounting structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively maintains secure positioning and sealing of low-ductility shroud segments despite thermal expansion differences, preventing overloads and preload loss, and reduces reliance on friction for axial positioning.

Implementation Method 1

a first spring element disposed between the flowpath component and the stationary structure which resiliently urges the flowpath in a first axial direction; and a second spring element disposed between the flowpath component and the stationary structure which resiliently urges the flowpath component in a second axial direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

a spring element disposed between the flowpath component and the stationary structure which resilient urges the flowpath component in the first direction against the bearing surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring compression: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS8998573B2Resilient mounting apparatus for low-ductility turbine shroud
Publication Date: 2015.04.07 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • US8998573B2 patent drawing
  • US8998573B2 patent drawing
  • US8998573B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A turbine flowpath apparatus for a gas turbine engine includes: a flowpath component exposed at least partially to a primary combustion gas flowpath of the engine, the flowpath component comprising low-ductility material; a metallic annular stationary structure surrounding the flowpath component, including a bearing surface which bears against the flowpath component, so as to restrain the flowpath component from axial movement in a first direction; and a spring element disposed between the flowpath component and the stationary structure which resilient urges the flowpath component in the first direction against the bearing surface.