Resistance Welding Feedback Control for Consistent Weld Quality

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Resistance welding processes face challenges in achieving consistent welding quality due to variations in welding parameters, leading to issues like weld spatter, which can contaminate surfaces and slow down production, and require manual re-parameterization of welding programs.

Innovation Solution

A method that dynamically adjusts welding parameters based on statistical analysis of welding quality characteristics, such as spatter occurrence, using automated control units to optimize electrode force and current profiles, reducing the need for manual intervention and improving welding efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If welding parameters are manually adjusted to reduce weld spatter, then weld quality improves, but production time increases and manual intervention is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweld qualityVSAvoidproduction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The welding system performs self-diagnosis and self-adjustment by automatically analyzing weld quality characteristics (such as spatter occurrence) and adjusting welding parameters without manual intervention. The control unit continuously monitors weld characteristics and autonomously optimizes parameters like electrode force and current profiles, enabling the system to serve itself and eliminate the need for manual parameter re-adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a closed-loop feedback mechanism where weld quality characteristics are measured during welding processes, analyzed statistically, and used to automatically adjust welding parameters for subsequent processes. This continuous feedback cycle enables real-time optimization of weld quality while maintaining high productivity, as the system learns from past weld outcomes and adapts parameters dynamically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If welding parameters are kept fixed for stability, then production efficiency is maintained, but weld quality consistency deteriorates due to parameter variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidweld quality consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The welding system transitions from static fixed parameters to dynamic adaptive parameters. The control unit continuously adjusts welding parameters based on real-time analysis of weld quality characteristics, allowing the system to adapt to variations in workpiece properties, electrode wear, and other changing conditions while maintaining both high productivity and consistent weld quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically changes welding parameters (such as electrode force, current profiles, and welding time) based on statistical analysis of weld quality characteristics. By dynamically modifying parameters rather than keeping them fixed, the system maintains weld quality consistency even as production conditions vary, while continuing to operate at high efficiency without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If statistical analysis is performed after every welding process, then weld quality optimization is maximized, but system complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweld quality optimizationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs statistical analysis selectively rather than after every single welding process. By analyzing weld quality characteristics after a predetermined number of welding processes or when specific conditions are met, the system achieves sufficient weld quality optimization without the excessive complexity and processing time that would result from analyzing every single weld, thereby balancing optimization with system simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach ensures continuous adaptation of welding parameters to achieve optimal welding quality, reduces weld spatter, and prevents production line stops, enhancing the overall efficiency and quality of resistance welding processes.

Implementation Method 1

The actual welding process then follows, during which the welding electrodes are energized with a welding current for the duration of a welding cycle. This causes resistance heating of the two workpieces to be welded between the welding electrodes, heating the workpieces to the required welding temperature.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResistance heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentEP3895835B1Method for resistance welding
Publication Date: 2023.05.03 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • EP3895835B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3895835B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3895835B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for resistance welding, wherein welding processes are carried out (201), in the course of which welding electrodes are pressed against a welding point of workpieces and energized with a welding current according to predetermined welding parameters (201), wherein at least one characteristic value characterizing a welding quality is determined in the course of these welding processes (202), wherein after a number of welding processes have been carried out a statistical analysis of the determined characteristic values ​​is carried out (203, 204, 205, 206) and wherein, depending on a result of this statistical analysis, it is determined whether an adjustment of the predetermined welding parameters should be carried out (207).