Wire-Fed Metal 3D Printing With Resistive Droplet Deposition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing additive manufacturing techniques for metallic parts face challenges such as high costs, safety risks, and inefficiencies due to the use of metal powders, which require excessive heat and result in waste and slow processing times.

Innovation Solution

The method involves using metal wire as feedstock, heated by electric current at the point of contact to form molten droplets for layer-by-layer fabrication, eliminating the need for sintering steps and reducing heat input, while leveraging established technologies like GMAW and RSW for precise control and safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If metal powder is used as feedstock for additive manufacturing, then the process can build metal structures layer by layer, but the process becomes slow and expensive due to the need to spread powder across the entire build area for each layer

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing speedVSAvoidtime for spreading powder
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the build area into only the necessary regions where material deposition is required, rather than treating the entire build area as active. This allows the system to focus energy and material placement only where needed, eliminating the time-consuming step of spreading powder across the full build area and significantly improving manufacturing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Strength

If laser sintering is used to fuse metal particles, then metal structures can be formed, but excessive heat is required and safety risks increase due to laser hazards

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebonding strength of metal particlesVSAvoidlaser safety risks and excessive heat
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the optical/mechanical laser sintering system with an electrical resistance heating system. Instead of using a high-power laser to fuse metal particles, the invention uses electric current passed through the metal wire feedstock and build plate to generate heat via electrical resistance, eliminating laser safety hazards and reducing excessive heat input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the heating parameter from optical energy (laser) to electrical energy (electric current). This parameter change fundamentally alters the heating mechanism, allowing for more precise thermal control and eliminating the safety risks associated with high-power lasers while maintaining the ability to fuse metal particles effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If metal powder is used in additive manufacturing, then layer-by-layer construction is possible, but material waste increases and cost increases due to the large amount of powder required to fill the build area

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial utilization efficiencyVSAvoidmetal powder waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the unnecessary material from the process by using wire feedstock instead of powder. This allows material to be deposited only in the exact locations and amounts needed for the part geometry, eliminating the waste inherent in powder-based systems where the entire build area must be filled with powder that is later removed or reused.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent eliminates the need for powder recovery and reuse operations by using consumable wire feedstock. The wire is fed continuously and consumed only where material is needed, removing the complex powder handling, spreading, and recovery infrastructure required in traditional powder-based additive manufacturing systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

4Ease of operation

If metal powder handling is performed in conventional additive manufacturing, then feedstock can be supplied to the build area, but safety risks increase due to dust inhalation and explosion hazards

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedstock handlingVSAvoiddust inhalation and explosion risks
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates an inert environment by using wire feedstock instead of loose powder. Wire form factor eliminates the dust generation inherent in powder handling, removing the need for complex dust collection, ventilation, and explosion prevention systems while maintaining safe feedstock supply to the build area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach minimizes waste, reduces safety concerns, and enables faster, more cost-effective production of metallic parts with improved resolution and versatility across various metals and alloys, using inert gas shielding and computer-controlled motion for precise deposition.

Implementation Method 1

heated by electric current at the point of contact to form molten droplets

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Implementation Method 2

form molten droplets for layer-by-layer fabrication

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFreezing: Freezing

Implementation Method 3

using inert gas shielding

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation prevention through inert atmosphere: Oxidation

Data Source

PatentUS11813690B2Systems for printing three-dimensional objects
Publication Date: 2023.11.14 RELATIVITY SPACE INC
  • US11813690B2 patent drawing
  • US11813690B2 patent drawing
  • US11813690B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides a system for printing a three-dimensional (3D) object. The system may comprise a source of at least one feedstock, a support for supporting at least a portion of the 3D object, a feeder for directing such feedstock from the source towards the support, and a power supply for supplying electrical current. The system may comprise a controller operatively coupled to the power supply. The controller may receive a computational representation of the 3D object. The controller may direct such feedstock through a feeder towards the support and may direct electrical current through such feedstock and into the support. The controller may subject such feedstock to heating such that at least a portion of such feedstock may deposit adjacent to the support. The controller may direct deposition of additional portions adjacent to the support and may direct an additional feedstock through such feeder and subject to heating.