Resource Agreement Matching for Device Repurposing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Devices deployed for specific services, such as home automation or environmental sensing, are difficult to repurpose for different services after initial deployment.

Innovation Solution

A system where an electronic device receives and transmits a resource agreement between an intent publishing device and a claiming device, allowing them to be matched and communicate effectively for service implementation, enabling easier re-purposing of devices across various services.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If devices are specifically configured for a particular service during deployment, then the service implementation reliability is improved, but the device adaptability for different services deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice implementation reliabilityVSAvoiddevice adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments device configuration into separate components: service-agnostic hardware resources and service-specific software configurations. This allows devices to maintain reliable service implementation through specific software configurations while retaining adaptability through the separable hardware layer that can be reassigned to different services.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic reconfigurability where device roles and service assignments can change over time. Devices transition from static, fixed-service configurations to dynamic states where they can be claimed by different services based on resource agreements, enabling both reliable current service operation and future adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of manufacture

If devices are configured for specific services with fixed roles, then the service functionality is improved, but the ease of re-purposing devices deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of re-purposingVSAvoidservice functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates universal device profiles that can serve multiple service types. By defining standardized resource agreements and claiming mechanisms, devices become multi-functional capable of being claimed by different services through a unified interface, making re-purposing as easy as initiating a new resource agreement without complex reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces service manifests and resource agreements as intermediary layers between devices and services. These intermediaries abstract the complexity of device-specific configurations, allowing services to claim and configure devices through standardized protocols, thereby simplifying re-purposing while maintaining service functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If a standardized resource agreement system is implemented, then the ease of operation for device matching is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of device matchingVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service mechanisms where devices automatically publish their resource capabilities and automatically respond to resource agreements. The matching process occurs autonomously through standardized protocols without requiring manual configuration or complex intervention, simplifying operation despite the underlying system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent standardizes device interaction around key parameters such as resource types, quantities, and service requirements. By focusing on these standardized parameters rather than full device complexity, the system achieves ease of operation through simplified matching criteria while managing device complexity through selective parameter exposure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11102085B2Service implementations via resource agreements
Publication Date: 2021.08.24 HEWLETT PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LP
  • US11102085B2 patent drawing
  • US11102085B2 patent drawing
  • US11102085B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An example electronic device includes a processor to receive, from an intent publishing device, a resource agreement associated with a service to be implemented via the intent publishing device. The processor is further to transmit the resource agreement to a claiming device. The processor is further to receive a confirmation from the claiming device, wherein the confirmation is to indicate that the claiming device is to implement the resource agreement. The processor is further to match the intent publishing device with the claiming device based on the confirmation.