Resource Allocation Model Selection for Efficient Task Coverage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Large scope machine learning models require significant training data and computational resources, often being overly complex for specific tasks, while smaller models necessitate multiple models to cover a broad range of tasks efficiently.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method that utilize a processor to receive resource and activity pattern data, identify input metadata, select a resource allocation machine learning model based on this metadata, and generate a resource allocation datum using the selected model, optimizing resource allocation by determining appropriate models for specific tasks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If large scope machine learning models are used, then task quality is improved, but computational resources and training data requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask qualityVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the machine learning model selection process by creating multiple specialized models, each trained on specific subsets of data and optimized for particular tasks. Instead of using one large comprehensive model, the system divides the task space into smaller domains and trains separate models for each, thereby reducing computational resource requirements while maintaining high task quality through specialized training.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic model selection where the system automatically chooses which specialized model to deploy based on the specific task requirements and available data. This dynamic approach allows the system to adapt the model scope to match the actual task needs, avoiding the use of overly complex models for simple tasks while ensuring sufficient complexity for complex tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If large scope machine learning models are used, then task quality is improved, but model complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask qualityVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the overall machine learning system into multiple independent specialized models. Each model is trained on specific data subsets and optimized for particular task domains, reducing the complexity of individual models while maintaining high task quality through collective specialization rather than monolithic complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by training specialized models with focused expertise in specific task domains. Each model develops deep local knowledge for its specific domain rather than attempting broad general knowledge, thereby reducing overall model complexity while maintaining high task quality through localized optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If smaller machine learning models are used, then computational efficiency is improved, but task coverage breadth decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoidtask coverage breadth
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the task coverage problem by creating multiple specialized models, each handling specific task domains. This segmentation allows the system to maintain computational efficiency through smaller specialized models while achieving broad task coverage through the collection of multiple models, each optimized for its specific domain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent achieves universality through a system architecture that can dynamically select from multiple specialized models based on task requirements. The system serves multiple functions by deploying different specialized models for different tasks, thereby achieving broad task coverage while maintaining computational efficiency through the use of smaller specialized models rather than one large universal model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If multiple specialized models are used, then computational efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary model selection system that acts as a mediator between task requirements and specialized models. This intermediary layer automatically selects the appropriate specialized model based on task characteristics, reducing the complexity burden on individual models while maintaining computational efficiency through specialization. The intermediary handles the coordination and selection logic, keeping the overall system manageable despite having multiple specialized models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12547943B2Systems and methods for resource allocation
Publication Date: 2026.02.10 THE STRATEGIC COACH
  • US12547943B2 patent drawing
  • US12547943B2 patent drawing
  • US12547943B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus for resource allocation, may include at least a processor; and a memory communicatively connected to the at least processor, wherein the memory contains instructions configuring the at least processor to receive a resource datum and a periodic activity pattern datum; identify input metadata as a function of the resource datum and the periodic activity pattern datum; select a resource allocation machine learning model as a function of the input metadata; and generate a resource allocation datum using the resource allocation machine learning model.