Resource Allocation Engine Using Occupancy Data Across Locations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Managing resources across multiple locations for organizations is time-consuming, costly, and inefficient due to discrepancies in employee distribution and resource allocation, leading to wasted time, money, and reduced efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing a resource engine that collects and analyzes data on organization, VPN, human capital, systems, and network performance to determine resource utilization and occupancy density, providing recommendations for resource reallocation through user interfaces, which can be automatically applied or directed by users, to optimize resource allocation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If resources are allocated based on employee count at each location, then resource allocation appears comprehensive, but actual resource utilization becomes inefficient due to employees working off-site

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilization efficiencyVSAvoidwasted resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops that continuously monitor employee location data, resource usage patterns, and occupancy levels. This feedback enables dynamic adjustment of resource allocation to match actual needs, preventing both over-provisioning and under-provisioning of resources across distributed locations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables locations to self-adjust resource allocation based on real-time data about actual occupancy and usage patterns. Each location can automatically optimize its own resource utilization without manual intervention, adapting to changing conditions as employees work remotely or on-site

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If manual methods are used to track and manage resources across multiple locations, then detailed control is maintained, but time and cost consumption increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource tracking accuracyVSAvoidtime for resource management
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual mechanical tracking methods with automated electronic data collection and analysis. Sensors, login data, and system integrations automatically capture resource usage information, eliminating the need for manual counting and reporting while maintaining high measurement precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary automated platform that acts as a mediator between various data sources (employee systems, resource management systems, occupancy sensors) and decision-makers. This intermediary consolidates and analyzes data from multiple sources, providing accurate resource tracking information without requiring manual intervention at any stage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If resources are allocated to ensure coverage at all locations, then service availability is maintained, but cost and inefficiency increase due to underutilized resources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice availabilityVSAvoidtotal resources required
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static resource allocation to dynamic allocation that adapts to changing conditions. Resource levels at each location are continuously adjusted based on real-time occupancy data, employee schedules, and actual usage patterns, ensuring service availability is maintained while optimizing the quantity of resources required

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes key parameters of resource allocation based on monitored conditions. When occupancy and usage patterns indicate lower demand, resource parameters such as inventory levels, staffing levels, or equipment allocation are adjusted downward, maintaining reliability while reducing the total quantity of resources required

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11734628B2Optimizing resource allocation for an organization
Publication Date: 2023.08.22 CERNER INNOVATION INC
  • US11734628B2 patent drawing
  • US11734628B2 patent drawing
  • US11734628B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present disclosure relate to systems, methods, and user interfaces for optimizing resource allocation for an organization. More particularly, embodiments of the present disclosure utilize multiple data sets to enable organizations to make intuitive business decisions and plan resources accordingly. To do so, various data is collected at a resource engine that utilizes the data to determine resource utilization, occupancy density, and a recommendation. In various embodiments, the resource utilization, occupancy density, and a recommendation may be provided to a user as an alert, a report, or a user interface. The user interface may additionally enable the user to apply the recommendation. In some embodiments, the recommendation may be automatically applied or the user may be directed to perform the recommendation. The alert, report, or user interface may additionally inform the user of the impact of performing or not performing the recommendation.