Resource Allocation Planning System for Workforce Deployment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Businesses face challenges in efficiently deploying resources, such as workforce members, to minimize costs and maximize revenue, due to the complexities of managing specialized skills, geographical redeployment, and changing demand, which existing resource allocation methods fail to address effectively.

Innovation Solution

A method for resource allocation planning that identifies supply and demand gaps and surpluses across future time periods and categories, allowing for adjustments such as training, redeployment, hiring, or releasing employees to optimize resource utilization based on predicted attrition and anticipated business changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If businesses deploy resources to meet current demand, then revenue is maximized, but resources may be tied up that could generate more revenue if deployed differently

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverevenue generationVSAvoidresource flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of future supply and demand gaps across multiple time periods and resource categories. By calculating projected gaps and surpluses in advance, the system enables proactive resource allocation decisions that prevent resource tie-ups while maintaining revenue generation capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts resource allocation based on changing conditions by continuously analyzing supply and demand variations across different time periods and categories. This dynamic approach allows resources to be reallocated optimally as business conditions evolve, balancing current revenue needs with future opportunities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If businesses minimize current costs by deploying resources efficiently, then profitability increases, but resources may not be available for future opportunities

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveprofitabilityVSAvoidresource availability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary identification of supply and demand gaps across multiple future time periods, allowing businesses to maintain optimal resource levels for current profitability while proactively planning for future resource needs before opportunities arise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback through calculated gaps and surpluses that inform ongoing resource allocation decisions. This feedback mechanism ensures that cost-minimization actions do not compromise future resource availability by continuously monitoring and adjusting allocations across time periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If businesses invest in training and developing specialized workforce skills, then long-term competitiveness improves, but short-term costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkforce capabilityVSAvoidtraining cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system identifies future skill gaps and surplus capabilities in advance, allowing businesses to plan training investments strategically. By knowing which skills will be needed in the future, companies can invest in training at optimal times rather than reactively incurring urgent training costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system analyzes workforce capabilities across different categories and time periods, identifying opportunities to reallocate existing skills to meet future demands. This parameter-based analysis reduces the need for costly new training by maximizing the utilization of current workforce capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Adaptability or versatility

If businesses geographically redeploy staff to meet demand, then service coverage improves, but redeployment costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeographic flexibilityVSAvoidredeployment cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system calculates geographic supply and demand gaps across future time periods, enabling proactive planning of redeployment activities. By identifying future geographic needs in advance, businesses can schedule redeployments during optimal times and minimize disruption costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically analyzes geographic distribution of resources and demands across multiple categories and time periods, identifying optimal redeployment opportunities. This dynamic analysis helps minimize redeployment costs by matching staff movements with actual business needs rather than arbitrary restructuring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8311865B2Generating a resource allocation action plan
Publication Date: 2012.11.13 ENT SERVICES DEV CORP LP
  • US8311865B2 patent drawing
  • US8311865B2 patent drawing
  • US8311865B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and techniques are provided for resource allocation planning. A future supply of resources and a future demand for resources may be identified for one or more future time periods and/or for one or more resource categories. The identified supply and the identified demand may then be combined to calculate gross gaps and surpluses in supply and demand for each of the future time periods and/or each of the resource categories. One or more resource allocation adjustments for addressing the gross gaps and surpluses in supply and demand may be received, and net gaps and surpluses for each future time period and or each resource category from the gross gaps and surpluses and the one or more received resource allocation adjustments.