Resource Configuration Engine with Policy Guardrails

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing resource configuration processes are inefficient due to the lack of guidance in validating configurations against policy constraints, leading to manual trial and error and increased computational and network inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A versatile engine is introduced to generate an improved user interface that recommends viable resource configurations based on available blueprints and guardrail constraints, providing specific parameter feedback for invalid configurations and reducing the likelihood of policy violations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If developers manually validate configurations against policy constraints using trial and error, then they can eventually achieve compliant configurations, but the process becomes time-consuming and computationally inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration complianceVSAvoidvalidation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The validation engine provides real-time feedback to developers during configuration input, immediately indicating when a configuration violates policy constraints and suggesting corrections. This continuous feedback loop eliminates the need for manual trial-and-error validation by guiding developers toward compliant configurations as they build them, significantly reducing validation time while maintaining compliance reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary validation checks before configurations are fully submitted or deployed. By checking constraints in advance and providing early warnings about potential violations, the system prevents non-compliant configurations from reaching later stages, reducing both time loss and computational waste on invalid configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If security services scan resources for vulnerabilities and policy breaches, then security issues are identified, but network and compute bloat increases and inefficiencies are created at scale

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity complianceVSAvoidcomputational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The validation engine performs security and policy compliance checks during the configuration creation phase, before resources are deployed. By validating configurations upfront against known policy constraints and security requirements, the system prevents non-compliant resources from being created, eliminating the need for extensive post-deployment scanning and reducing computational energy consumption at scale.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The validation engine acts as an intermediary between configuration input and resource deployment, filtering out non-compliant configurations before they reach the deployment pipeline. This intermediary layer prevents invalid configurations from consuming computational resources in downstream security scanning and operations processes, reducing overall system energy loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If validators provide only binary outputs (valid/invalid), then validation is simple and fast, but developers lack guidance on how to achieve valid configurations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidation speedVSAvoidconfiguration guidance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The validation engine enhances binary valid/invalid outputs with detailed explanatory feedback that identifies specific constraint violations and suggests corrective actions. This enriched feedback maintains the speed of binary validation while providing developers with actionable guidance on how to modify configurations to achieve compliance, improving ease of operation without sacrificing validation speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250077378A1Engine for driving resource configuration user interface
Publication Date: 2025.03.06 RESOURCELY INC
  • US20250077378A1 patent drawing
  • US20250077378A1 patent drawing
  • US20250077378A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An application selects a blueprint for configuration of a resource and retrieves guardrails corresponding to the resource. The application inputs the blueprint and the guardrails into an engine and receives, as output from the engine, a mapping of constraints to respective variables of the blueprint. The application retrieves, from a knowledge graph, definable variables for the resource. The application generates filtered values for each of the definable values by filtering values for each of the definable variables based on the mapping. The application generates for display a user interface for configuration of the resource, the user interface comprising prompts based on the filtered values.