Resource Consumption Control System Calibration via Performance Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing control systems for managing resource consumption by agents provide inaccurate estimates and struggle to adapt to variations, leading to poor communication of individual consumption needs and inconsistent measurement units.

Innovation Solution

The system compares performance feedback with the output of a performance model to calibrate resource consumption control, transforming predicted expenditure into specific and normalized units for resource distribution, and adjusts consumption instructions based on performance metrics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If typical control systems employ models to estimate individual consumption needs, then resource consumption can be controlled, but the estimates are inaccurate and the models fail to adapt to variations in agents

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of consumption estimationVSAvoidadaptability to agent variations
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously compares actual agent performance metrics against predicted performance from the model, using the discrepancies to recalibrate model parameters. This feedback loop enables the system to improve estimation accuracy while adapting to individual agent variations over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts model parameters based on observed agent behavior and performance data. By changing parameters in response to actual performance measurements, the model adapts to variations in agents while maintaining accurate consumption estimates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If control systems use inconsistent measurement units, then they can operate with diverse data, but communication of consumption needs becomes problematic and requires human intervention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to handle diverse measurement unitsVSAvoidclarity of consumption communication
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically performs unit conversion and normalization, acting as an intermediary between diverse measurement units and the control decisions. This eliminates the need for human intervention to resolve unit discrepancies while maintaining the ability to handle diverse data formats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If control systems fail to account for poor consumption measurement or tracking by agents, then the system remains simple, but performance criteria cannot be accurately evaluated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of control systemVSAvoidaccuracy of performance evaluation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically detects and adjusts for measurement quality issues without requiring complex external validation mechanisms. By monitoring the reliability of agent-reported consumption data and adjusting evaluations accordingly, the system maintains simplicity while improving performance evaluation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12211606B2Comparing performance feedback with output of performance model to calibrate resource consumption control system and improve performance criterion
Publication Date: 2025.01.28 FUELOGICS LLC
  • US12211606B2 patent drawing
  • US12211606B2 patent drawing
  • US12211606B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments are directed to improving performance criterion in a control session. Information associated with an agent may be obtained. A predicted expenditure may be generated based on the information and a performance model. The predicted expenditure may be transformed into specific-units amounts of multiple resource types based on the characteristics information. Each specific-units amount may be transformed into a normalized-units amount based on one or more normalized-units amounts of one or more other resource types. An instruction may be provided to the agent based on the normalized-units amounts. Metrics based on monitoring the agent may be obtained. One or more portions of the metrics may be compared to one or more outputs of the performance model. One or more outputs of the model may be modified based on the comparison to increase a correlation between one or more outputs and the metrics.