Resource Management Indicators for Automatic Closure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing programming languages face challenges in efficiently handling resources with close methods that may complete erroneously, leading to resource leaks and increased code complexity, particularly when using resource-management statements.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of indicators in the programming language platform, such as the 'SilentCloseable' and 'IdempotentCloseable' interfaces, allows for the omission of exception-handling constructs and facilitates the use of resource-management statements by distinguishing between resources with close methods that do not complete erroneously and those with idempotent close methods.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual closing of resources is performed using try-catch-finally blocks, then resources can be closed, but code length and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource closure reliabilityVSAvoidcode complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The resource-management statement enables resources to close themselves automatically through the declared variable scope. The compiler automatically generates the necessary finally blocks and close method calls without requiring manual intervention, making the system self-servicing and eliminating complex exception-handling constructs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The resource declaration is performed preliminarily within the try block scope, establishing the resource lifecycle before the actual resource operations occur. This preliminary declaration allows the compiler to automatically set up the cleanup mechanism in advance, eliminating the need for manual finally blocks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If exception-handling constructs are included for close methods that may complete erroneously, then checked exceptions can be handled, but code complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexception handling capabilityVSAvoidcode complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The exception-handling requirement is extracted from the user code and handled automatically by the compiler. The indicator mechanism separates the concern of exception handling from the resource management logic, allowing developers to write clean code while the compiler handles the exception-handling constructs automatically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The indicator acts as an intermediary between the resource type and the compiler. By marking resources with indicators that specify whether their close methods may complete erroneously, the indicator mediates the interaction between resource management and exception handling, enabling the compiler to automatically generate appropriate exception-handling constructs only when necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If resource-management statements automatically close resources, then resource leaks are reduced, but resources with erroneous close methods require exception-handling constructs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource leak preventionVSAvoidexception-handling requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The exception-handling requirement is applied locally only to resources whose close methods may complete erroneously, rather than universally to all resources. The indicator mechanism allows the compiler to identify and apply exception-handling constructs only where necessary, maintaining automatic resource closure for all resources while adding exception handling only when the local quality of the close method requires it.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Ease of operation

If close methods are called automatically after resource usage, then manual closing is simplified, but resources may be closed before close method is called causing resource leaks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource closing easeVSAvoidresource leak risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The resource declaration is performed preliminarily within the try block scope, establishing the resource lifecycle before the actual resource operations occur. This preliminary declaration allows the compiler to automatically set up the cleanup mechanism in advance, ensuring resources are closed only after they have been properly initialized and used.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The resource-management statement enables resources to close themselves automatically through the declared variable scope. The compiler automatically generates the necessary finally blocks and close method calls, ensuring resources are closed at the appropriate time without requiring manual intervention or risking premature closure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS9141343B2Indicators for resources with close methods that do not complete erroneously in software programs
Publication Date: 2015.09.22 ORACLE INT CORP
  • US9141343B2 patent drawing
  • US9141343B2 patent drawing
  • US9141343B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosed embodiments provide a system that facilitates the development and compilation of a software program. During operation, the system provides, in a programming language platform associated with source code for the software program, an indicator for a resource with a close method that does not complete erroneously. Next, the system enables use of the indicator with a resource-management statement in the source code, wherein the indicator facilitates omission of an exception-handling construct for the resource-management statement.