Technology Resource Metric Analysis for Facility Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Facilities face challenges in determining when and to what extent to alter technology resources such as hardware, middleware, or software, as existing methods lack comprehensive assessment of determinative factors like level of performance and qualitative value, making it difficult to maximize resource value and predict resource volume changes.

Innovation Solution

A system that analyzes technology resources using a computing platform with databases to correlate performance, user results, and qualitative value data to determine a technology resource metric, triggering actions for adjustment and comparing metrics across facilities to predict resource volume changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If comprehensive assessment of multiple determinative factors is implemented, then accuracy of resource alteration determination is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of resource alteration determinationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the comprehensive assessment into three distinct database components: a first database storing performance level data, a second database storing qualitative value data, and a third database storing results data. This segmentation allows each database to handle specific types of determinative factors independently, reducing the complexity of managing all factors in a single system while maintaining comprehensive assessment accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an index as an intermediary element that compares determinative factors across multiple facilities. The index serves as a mediator that synthesizes data from multiple sources and provides a standardized comparison mechanism, reducing the complexity of direct multi-facility comparisons while improving the accuracy of resource alteration determinations through benchmarking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If technology resource alteration is increased to maximize qualitative value, then resource value is improved, but resource volume control becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequalitative value of technology resourceVSAvoidresource volume control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring performance levels, qualitative values, and results data across multiple facilities. The index provides feedback on how resource alterations affect overall system performance, enabling control operators to adjust resource volumes based on measured outcomes. This feedback loop ensures that qualitative value maximization does not lead to loss of volume control, as decisions are guided by empirical data from the feedback system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If determinative factors are not comprehensively assessed, then system simplicity is maintained, but resource alteration timing and degree cannot be accurately determined

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidresource alteration timing accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by establishing the multi-database framework and index comparison mechanism in advance. Performance data, qualitative values, and results are collected and stored before resource alteration decisions are needed. This preliminary data collection and system setup enables accurate timing and degree determination of resource alterations when needed, without requiring complex real-time analysis during critical decision moments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10755213B2System for resource utilization analysis and resource alteration
Publication Date: 2020.08.25 BANK OF AMERICA CORP
  • US10755213B2 patent drawing
  • US10755213B2 patent drawing
  • US10755213B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system directed to analyzing technology resources in terms of many different factors to determine a need to alter/adjust the technology resource. Specifically, the present invention correlates data associated with (i) a level of performance of a technology resource relative to technology resource users, (ii) results of the technology resource relative to facility users, and (iii) a qualitative value associated with the technology resource to determine a technology resource metric that indicates a need to alter/adjust the technology resource and trigger one or more actions associated with altering/adjusting the technology resource. In specific embodiments, the technology resource metric of one facility is compared to one or a plurality of other facilities to determine a technology resource index for the technology resource.