Real-Time Resource Reduction Notification System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional systems fail to personalize resource consumption reduction recommendations for user systems, as they do not consider demographic data or past actions of similar user systems, leading to ineffective adaptation of artificial intelligence models.

Innovation Solution

The system identifies similar user systems using demographic and resource consumption data, applies machine learning models to determine expected resource consumption, and generates tailored recommendations for reducing resource consumption by processing data through clustering and multi-label classification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If conventional systems generate resource consumption recommendations without considering user-specific demographics and similar user systems, then the system complexity is reduced, but the recommendation efficacy and personalization are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidrecommendation efficacy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments user systems into groups based on demographic characteristics and resource consumption patterns. By dividing the user base into similar user systems, the system can provide personalized recommendations without analyzing every individual user's complete data, thus reducing complexity while maintaining recommendation efficacy through targeted segmentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops by monitoring resource consumption before and after recommended actions are executed. This feedback mechanism allows the system to learn from actual outcomes, continuously improving recommendation efficacy while managing complexity through iterative learning rather than complex upfront modeling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If the system collects and processes demographic data and resource consumption data from multiple user systems, then the personalization of recommendations is improved, but the data processing complexity and computational requirements are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization capabilityVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-identifying similar user systems and pre-processing their demographic and consumption data. This allows the system to have ready-made comparison groups when generating recommendations, reducing real-time processing complexity while maintaining high personalization capability through pre-computed similarities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates simplified copies or representations of user systems based on their demographic and consumption patterns. By working with these aggregated representations rather than raw individual data, the system achieves personalization through pattern matching while significantly reducing data processing complexity and computational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If the system uses machine learning models to analyze resource consumption data and generate recommendations, then the accuracy of resource reduction predictions is improved, but the computational time and processing overhead are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial machine learning analysis by focusing on the most relevant features and similar user systems rather than analyzing all available data comprehensively. This selective approach maintains prediction accuracy for key metrics while reducing computational time by avoiding excessive processing of less critical data elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts model parameters and analysis depth based on the specific context and available data. By changing parameters such as the number of similar user systems to analyze or the complexity of the machine learning model used, the system optimizes the balance between prediction accuracy and computational time for each recommendation scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240202032A1Systems and methods for generating real-time resource reduction notifications
Publication Date: 2024.06.20 CAPITAL ONE SERVICES LLC
  • US20240202032A1 patent drawing
  • US20240202032A1 patent drawing
  • US20240202032A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for generating real-time resource reduction notifications are described. The system receives, for a user system, a resource consumption and a dataset during a first period of time. The system processes the dataset to determine other user systems similar to the user system. The system generates an expected resource consumption of the user system during the first period of time based on resource consumption during one or more periods of time for the similar user systems. If the resource consumption of the user system exceeds the expected resource consumption, the system determines an action to reduce resource consumption of the user system. The system receives a reduced resource consumption of the user system during a second period of time. The system generates a notification to the similar user systems indicating the executed action and an amount of reduction in resource consumption.