Resource-Type Weighting for Hardware Use Rights

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Purchasers of computer systems face costly interruptions when upgrading hardware to meet increased demands due to limited-use purchase models, where only a subset of hardware and software is initially purchased, and existing technologies do not effectively manage resource reallocation to handle spikes in demand or resource migration between different resources.

Innovation Solution

A server system with a resource controller and use rights calculator that manages and reallocates hardware resources by applying weighting coefficients to different types of resources, allowing for flexible activation and deactivation of resources based on demand, and enabling migration of use rights among resources while maintaining a consistent relationship between utility and pricing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If purchasers buy only enough hardware to meet current average demand, then initial costs are reduced, but costly interruptions occur when upgrading hardware to meet increased demands

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehardware quantityVSAvoidinterruption time
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-provisions hardware resources beyond current needs and pre-configures use rights that can be activated when demand increases. This preliminary preparation eliminates interruptions by having resources ready before they are needed, allowing seamless scaling from average to peak demand.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically activates or deactivates use rights based on real-time demand conditions. The resource controller adjusts the active hardware configuration from the pre-provisioned pool, enabling flexible transition between low-utilization and high-utilization states without physical hardware changes or service interruptions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If purchasers buy reserve computing power, then capacity for demand spikes is available, but costs increase for unused resources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedemand handling capacityVSAvoidpaid resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements partial action by activating only the portion of pre-provisioned use rights that is actually needed at any given time. While hardware for peak demand is physically present and licensed, only the necessary subset is actively utilized and billed, avoiding payment for continuously idle resources while maintaining peak capacity availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the utilization parameter of hardware resources dynamically. The same physical hardware can operate at low utilization during average demand periods and high utilization during peak periods, with use rights activation status serving as the controlling parameter that adjusts resource consumption and billing accordingly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If use rights are allowed to migrate among resources, then resource reallocation flexibility is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource reallocation flexibilityVSAvoidmanagement system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The resource controller serves as an intermediary that manages use right migrations between resources. It maintains the use rights database, tracks entitlements, and orchestrates the complex coordination required for seamless resource reallocation, thereby isolating the complexity from users and presenting a simplified interface for resource management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If weighting coefficients are applied to different resource types, then consistent pricing-utility relationship is maintained, but calculation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepricing consistencyVSAvoidcalculation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex manual pricing calculations with an automated computational system. The use rights calculator implements weighting coefficients mathematically to automatically compute equivalent use rights across different resource types, ensuring consistent pricing-utility relationships through systematic calculation rather than ad hoc decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS8386391B1Resource-type weighting of use rights
Publication Date: 2013.02.26 HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEV LP
  • US8386391B1 patent drawing
  • US8386391B1 patent drawing
  • US8386391B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Resource-type weighting is used in evaluating the use-rights associated with hardware resources.