Respirator Filtration Test Chamber for Low-Flow Cost Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for evaluating respirator materials are costly and complex, failing to provide efficient filtration efficiency testing at low airflow rates as required by NIOSH and KN95 standards.

Innovation Solution

A low-cost system comprising an aerosolized particle source, mixing chamber, vacuum source, airtight respirator chamber, and sensors for measuring aerosol filtration efficiency, which uses a venturi vacuum pump for controlled airflow and manual chamber closure for safety, enabling testing at 30 lpm flow rate and providing an indication of filtration efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If existing systems are used for evaluating respirator materials, then filtration efficiency testing can be performed, but the systems are costly and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiltration efficiency testingVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the evaluation chamber into separate upstream and downstream regions with distinct sensors, allowing independent measurement and simplifying the overall system architecture. The chamber is segmented into test zones that can be independently controlled and measured.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs inexpensive particulate matter sensors instead of expensive traditional filtration testing equipment. The system uses cost-effective components such as aerosol generators, vacuum pumps, and digital sensors to achieve accurate filtration efficiency measurements without requiring costly specialized equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Measurement precision

If existing systems are used for evaluating respirator materials, then filtration efficiency testing can be performed, but the systems are costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiltration efficiency testingVSAvoidsystem cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces expensive traditional filtration testing equipment with inexpensive components including particulate matter sensors, aerosol generators, and vacuum pumps. The design prioritizes cost-effectiveness by using readily available electronic components and simplified mechanical structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes complex mechanical filtration testing apparatus with electronic sensing systems. Instead of using traditional mechanical counters or complex flow measurement devices, the system employs electronic particulate matter sensors that provide accurate measurements through electrical signals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If high airflow rates are used for testing, then filtration efficiency can be measured, but the system cannot meet NIOSH and KN95 standards requiring low airflow rates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiltration efficiency measurementVSAvoidairflow rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the vacuum pump operation to maintain the required low airflow rates while ensuring sufficient aerosol delivery for accurate measurement. The vacuum pump can vary its output to match different testing requirements, enabling compliance with both NIOSH and KN95 standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operating parameters of the vacuum pump and aerosol generator to achieve the specific airflow rates required by NIOSH and KN95 standards. By adjusting vacuum level, aerosol concentration, and flow rate parameters, the system can meet different testing requirements without compromising measurement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively evaluates respirator materials according to NIOSH and KN95 standards at a lower airflow rate, ensuring safety and reducing operational complexity and cost while maintaining high filtration efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

The vacuum source includes a venturi vacuum pump uses positive pressure to generate a suction flow

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVenturi effect: Venturi Effect

Implementation Method 2

the first sensor and the second sensor may be configured to measure light scattering

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight scattering: Scattering

Implementation Method 3

The drying apparatus may include silica gel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbsorption: Absorption (physical)

Data Source

PatentUS12492979B2Systems, devices, and methods for low-cost respirator evaluation
Publication Date: 2025.12.09 UNIV OF MARYLAND
  • US12492979B2 patent drawing
  • US12492979B2 patent drawing
  • US12492979B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for the evaluation of respirator materials includes an aerosolized particle source configured to selectively provide aerosolized particles, a mixing chamber including a drying apparatus, a vacuum source configured to control airflow, an airtight respirator chamber for evaluating respirator materials, a processor, and a memory. The airtight respirator chamber includes a first sub-chamber, a second sub-chamber, a first sensor and a second sensor. The memory includes instructions stored thereon, which when executed by the processor cause the system to: obtain the first signal and the second signal; determine an aerosol filtration efficiency based on a difference between the first signal and second signal; compare the aerosol filtration efficiency to a predetermined threshold; and provide an indication whether the aerosol filtration efficiency is above or below the predetermined threshold.