Respiratory Device Bacteria Sensor Hygiene Compliance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Breathing treatment devices, such as CPAP machines, face challenges in maintaining cleanliness, particularly in humidification chambers, where bacterial growth can occur, leading to potential infection risks for users. Current cleaning regimes are often prescriptive, time-consuming, and may not be necessary for all users, potentially reducing compliance.

Innovation Solution

Integration of bacteria sensors within the device to detect microbial growth and provide visual or audio alerts for users, allowing for a personalized cleaning schedule based on detected bacterial presence, with optional automatic sterilization systems to minimize cleaning frequency and focus on affected areas.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a prescriptive cleaning regime is implemented, then hygiene standards are maintained, but user compliance decreases due to time-consuming and labour-intensive requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehygiene standardVSAvoiduser compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where bacteria sensors continuously monitor the humidification chamber and provide real-time information about bacterial presence. This feedback loop allows the system to dynamically adjust cleaning requirements based on actual contamination levels rather than following a fixed schedule, thereby maintaining hygiene standards while reducing unnecessary cleaning tasks and improving user compliance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by automatically detecting bacterial contamination and notifying users through visual or audio alerts. The device monitors itself and determines when cleaning is actually needed, eliminating the need for users to follow a prescriptive cleaning regime. This autonomous monitoring reduces the labour burden on users while ensuring hygiene is maintained through data-driven decision-making

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Object-affected harmful factors

If frequent cleaning is required, then bacterial contamination is reduced, but user burden increases and compliance decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebacterial contaminationVSAvoidcleaning frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The bacteria sensors provide continuous feedback on contamination levels, allowing the system to determine the actual cleaning frequency needed. Instead of enforcing frequent cleaning regardless of necessity, the feedback mechanism enables dynamic adjustment of cleaning schedules based on real-time bacterial detection, reducing unnecessary cleaning tasks while maintaining adequate hygiene

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by cleaning only when and where bacteria are actually detected rather than performing complete cleaning cycles frequently. The bacteria sensors identify specific contaminated areas, allowing targeted cleaning interventions that reduce overall cleaning time and effort while still addressing the harmful bacterial contamination effectively

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Adaptability or versatility

If bacteria sensors are integrated into the device, then personalized cleaning regimens are enabled, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalized cleaning regimeVSAvoidsensor integration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The integration of bacteria sensors creates a feedback system that enables personalized cleaning regimens by providing real-time data on bacterial presence. The sensors adapt to individual user patterns and contamination levels, allowing the device to customize cleaning recommendations for each user rather than applying a one-size-fits-all approach, thereby achieving high adaptability despite the added complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Loss of time

If automated sterilization systems are added, then cleaning frequency is reduced, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning frequencyVSAvoidsterilization system
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated sterilization system performs self-service by automatically detecting and eliminating bacterial contamination without requiring manual user intervention. The system monitors itself and executes sterilization cycles when contamination is detected, reducing the time and effort users would otherwise spend on manual cleaning while managing the complexity through automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical cleaning actions with an automated sterilization system that uses alternative mechanisms (such as UV radiation or thermal processing) to eliminate bacteria. This substitution reduces the need for frequent manual cleaning interventions while managing system complexity through automated control and sensor integration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20240325583A1Respiratory device
Publication Date: 2024.10.03 FISHER & PAYKEL HEALTHCARE LTD
  • US20240325583A1 patent drawing
  • US20240325583A1 patent drawing
  • US20240325583A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A breathing treatment apparatus delivers breathing gas to a user. The apparatus May be configured to comprise one or more sensors for sensing microbial growth within the apparatus.