Respiratory Therapy Parameter Optimization via User Data Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Individuals with sleep-related and respiratory disorders often experience suboptimal compliance with respiratory therapy systems due to discomfort and inefficiencies in parameter settings, leading to inadequate treatment of conditions such as sleep apnea and COPD.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that optimize respiratory therapy system parameters by receiving user data and usage data to determine initial and recommended settings, using a control system with processors to adjust settings for improved comfort and effectiveness, including features like Expiratory Pressure Relief and humidity adjustment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If respiratory therapy system parameters are standardized for all users, then device complexity is reduced, but user comfort and compliance deteriorate due to lack of personalization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser comfortVSAvoidparameter optimization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically optimizes parameters by receiving user data (demographic information, sleep study results) and usage data, then generates recommended parameter values without requiring manual intervention. The control system self-adjusts therapy settings based on analyzed data, eliminating the need for complex manual parameter tuning while maintaining high personalization levels

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts therapy parameters (pressure levels, ramp rates, exponential rates) based on individual user characteristics and usage patterns. Different parameter sets are generated for different user populations (e.g., children vs. adults, different apnea severities), allowing optimized performance for each user without requiring system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If manual parameter adjustment is required, then device complexity is reduced, but treatment efficacy deteriorates due to suboptimal compliance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment efficacyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors usage data and compares it against target values to assess compliance. When users do not meet target compliance levels, the system can identify patterns and suggest parameter adjustments or alert healthcare providers. This feedback mechanism ensures treatment efficacy is maintained while reducing the need for complex manual monitoring and adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system pre-calculates and generates recommended parameter values based on user data before therapy begins. This preliminary optimization ensures that when users start treatment, they receive parameters already tailored to their needs, improving initial compliance and treatment efficacy without requiring complex real-time adjustments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If therapy parameters are optimized for each user, then user compliance improves, but data processing requirements and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser complianceVSAvoiddata processing volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments users into different categories based on demographic information, sleep study results, and usage patterns. Instead of processing every user individually from scratch, the system applies predefined parameter optimization rules for different user segments (e.g., children with OSA, adults with COPD), significantly reducing data processing volume while maintaining high personalization levels

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system processes and analyzes only the essential data points needed for parameter optimization (demographic information, key sleep parameters, usage metrics) rather than processing all possible data. This selective data processing approach maintains sufficient personalization for compliance improvement while minimizing data processing requirements and system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250001110A1Systems and methods for optimizing parameters of a respiratory therapy system
Publication Date: 2025.01.02 RESMED PTY LTD
  • US20250001110A1 patent drawing
  • US20250001110A1 patent drawing
  • US20250001110A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of optimizing a plurality of parameters of a respiratory therapy system comprises receiving user data associated with a user of the respiratory therapy system. The method further comprises determining an initial value of each of the plurality of parameters is based at least in part on the user data. Each of the plurality of parameters is associated with a comfort level of the user. The method further comprises receiving usage data associated with use of the respiratory therapy system during a first period of time in which each of the plurality of parameters has its initial value. The method further comprises generating a recommended value of each of the plurality of parameters for use of the respiratory therapy system during a second period of time after the first period of time, based at least in part on the user data and the usage data.