Intelligent Response Agent With Stepwise Evidence-Based Reasoning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional deep learning-based question-answering systems struggle with providing accurate responses to in-depth queries requiring sophisticated reasoning and inference, particularly in specialized documents like scientific and technical papers, due to the limitations of Machine Reading Comprehension models in handling non-factoid questions and the need for extensive training on deep document comprehension.

Innovation Solution

A method and system utilizing a deep-learning neural network that implements a stepwise process for sophisticated reasoning and inference, including an associative selection process to identify relevant paragraphs, a rationale generation process to acquire supporting data, and a systematic composition process to generate response data, thereby enhancing the accuracy and reliability of answers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If Machine Reading Comprehension models are used for question answering, then the system can extract short answers from specific paragraphs, but it fails to provide accurate responses to in-depth queries requiring sophisticated reasoning and inference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanswer accuracyVSAvoidhandling capability for in-depth queries
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the question answering process into distinct stages: query analysis, document retrieval, evidence extraction, rationale generation, and answer composition. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, enabling the system to handle both simple factoid questions and complex in-depth queries requiring sophisticated reasoning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary reasoning module that acts as a bridge between the MRC model and the final answer generation. This intermediary component performs sophisticated reasoning and inference on the extracted evidence, transforming simple paragraph-based answers into well-reasoned responses for in-depth queries while maintaining factual accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If conventional deep learning models are trained on question-answering datasets, then the models can answer fact-based questions, but they cannot handle in-depth questions requiring knowledge processing and reasoning innovations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanswer generation capabilityVSAvoidreasoning capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by first retrieving and analyzing relevant document passages before generating answers. This preliminary evidence gathering and rationale generation step ensures that subsequent answer composition is based on solid factual grounds, enabling reliable reasoning for in-depth queries while maintaining efficient answer generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the generated rationale and evidence are evaluated against the original query to ensure logical consistency and factual accuracy. This feedback loop allows the system to refine its reasoning process and improve the reliability of answers for complex questions while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If MRC models extract answers from presented text, then the system can provide factoid answers, but it cannot provide answers when no text has been generated or for queries requiring deep document comprehension

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of answer extractionVSAvoidhandling capability for queries without presented text
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves universality by integrating multiple functions: automatic document retrieval, text generation, evidence extraction, rationale generation, and answer composition. This multi-functional architecture allows the system to handle diverse query types including factoid questions, in-depth queries, and questions without pre-presented text, while maintaining the simplicity of automated answer extraction through unified processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20260064726A1Method and system for providing intelligent response agent based on sophisticated reasoning and inference function
Publication Date: 2026.03.05 LG MANAGEMENT DEV INST CO LTD
  • US20260064726A1 patent drawing
  • US20260064726A1 patent drawing
  • US20260064726A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for providing an intelligent response agent based on a sophisticated reasoning and speculation function can generate and provide response data for queries related to specialized documents using a deep-learning neural network that implements a stepwise process for a sophisticated reasoning and speculation function.