Response-Based Resource Management for 5G CoMP Reliability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication systems, particularly in 5G networks, face challenges in ensuring reliable and low-latency communications due to interference and poor channel conditions, which affect the transmission of acknowledgments (ACK/NACK) between user equipment (UE) and transmit/receive points (TRPs), especially in environments with stringent reliability and latency requirements like factory automation and ultra-reliable low-latency communications (URLLC).

Innovation Solution

The implementation of response-based resource management, where UEs and TRPs determine the optimal TRP to transmit uplink responses based on channel conditions, using coordinated multipoint (CoMP) transmissions and different time-frequency resources to minimize interference and ensure reliable ACK/NACK transmissions, by selecting the most suitable TRP for data transmission based on the determined uplink response.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If UEs transmit uplink responses to the original TRP regardless of channel conditions, then the transmission procedure is simple, but the reliability of ACK/NACK transmissions deteriorates under poor channel conditions and interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of ACK/NACK transmissionsVSAvoidcomplexity of TRP selection mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic TRP selection where UEs adaptively choose which TRP to transmit uplink responses to, based on real-time channel conditions. The UE determines channel quality metrics and dynamically switches between TRP1 and TRP2, transforming a static transmission scheme into a dynamic one that responds to changing environmental conditions, thereby improving reliability without requiring complex manual configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback mechanisms where UEs monitor channel conditions and provide implicit feedback through their TRP selection decisions. The network receives information about which TRP the UE selected and uses this feedback to adjust resource allocations and coordination between TRPs, creating a closed-loop system that continuously optimizes transmission reliability based on actual channel state

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of time

If the system uses single TRP transmissions, then the system complexity is low, but the ability to meet stringent latency requirements deteriorates in poor channel conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelatency in response transmissionsVSAvoidcomplexity of coordinated multipoint system
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent configures multiple TRPs and their associated time-frequency resources in advance before transmission occurs. The network pre-establishes the coordinated multipoint structure, allocating specific resources to TRP1 and TRP2 beforehand, so that when transmission is needed, the UE can immediately select the appropriate pre-configured TRP without complex real-time negotiation, reducing latency while maintaining system capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the coverage area and transmission resources across multiple TRPs, with each TRP responsible for specific time-frequency resources. This segmentation allows the network to distribute the load and provide multiple parallel transmission paths, reducing the time required for successful transmission by enabling the UE to switch to an alternative TRP if one is experiencing poor conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If the system allocates same time-frequency resources to multiple TRPs, then resource utilization is high, but interference between TRPs increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilization efficiencyVSAvoidinterference between TRPs
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent assigns different time-frequency resource qualities to different TRPs, creating a localized resource allocation scheme where TRP1 and TRP2 operate on distinct resource sets. This local differentiation of resource quality allows each TRP to transmit without interfering with the other, while the overall system maintains high utilization by ensuring that resources are fully allocated across the distributed TRP infrastructure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11877294B2Response-based resource management
Publication Date: 2024.01.16 QUALCOMM INC
  • US11877294B2 patent drawing
  • US11877294B2 patent drawing
  • US11877294B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Certain aspects of the present disclosure provide techniques for support response-based resource management. A UE may determine an uplink response to be transmitted in response to a downlink transmission by a first TRP participating in CoMP to the UE with a second TRP. The first UE may select which of the first TRP or the second TRP to transmit the uplink response to, based at least in part on the determined uplink response and may transmit the uplink response to the selected first or second TRP.