Process Dynamics Change Detection Using Response Time Mapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Industrial process control systems face challenges in detecting changes in dynamic behavior due to noisy data and multiple parameters, making it difficult to determine when process behavior has shifted, which can lead to poor quality production if not addressed promptly.

Innovation Solution

The system maps process parameters to a lower dimensional space by combining parameters like time constant and time delay into a response time parameter or examining the frequency response, reducing the parameter space to two more stable parameters that are easier to monitor for changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple process parameters are monitored individually, then comprehensive process information is obtained, but noise and variability increase making change detection difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechange detection accuracyVSAvoidnumber of parameters
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple process parameters (time constant, time delay, and other dynamic characteristics) into a single composite parameter called 'response time'. This merging reduces the number of parameters from multiple individual measurements to one aggregated metric, thereby reducing noise and variability while maintaining comprehensive process information. The response time parameter integrates the effects of multiple underlying parameters, making change detection more reliable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the complex process dynamics into distinct components (time constant, time delay, gain) that can be individually analyzed and then recombined. By breaking down the overall process behavior into these fundamental elements, the system can identify which specific aspect is changing and combine them into a unified response time metric that highlights significant changes while filtering out noise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If controller tuning parameters are adjusted to match process dynamic behavior, then control performance improves, but when process behavior changes, re-tuning is required which degrades productivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol performanceVSAvoidproduction continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous monitoring of the response time parameter and compares it against reference values or historical data. When significant changes in response time are detected, the system generates alerts or automatically triggers re-tuning procedures. This feedback mechanism ensures that control performance is maintained by detecting process changes early, allowing for timely intervention before quality degradation occurs, thus balancing reliability with productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary detection of process changes by continuously monitoring the response time parameter before actual quality degradation occurs. By detecting changes in dynamic behavior early, the system allows for proactive re-tuning or process adjustment, preventing the need for reactive measures that would cause production interruptions. This preliminary action maintains both control performance and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If frequent process monitoring is performed to detect behavior changes, then quality maintenance is improved, but unnecessary experiments and interventions increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality consistencyVSAvoidintervention frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms multiple process parameters into a single response time parameter that is more sensitive to meaningful changes and less sensitive to normal process variability. By monitoring this transformed parameter with appropriate thresholds and statistical methods, the system can distinguish between significant process changes requiring intervention and normal fluctuations that do not require action. This reduces unnecessary interventions while maintaining quality consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10976718B2System and method for monitoring changes in process dynamic behavior by mapping parameters to a lower dimensional space
Publication Date: 2021.04.13 HONEYWELL LTD(CA)
  • US10976718B2 patent drawing
  • US10976718B2 patent drawing
  • US10976718B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes acquiring process data collected in an industrial process control and automation system. The method also includes reducing a dimension space of the process data by combining two or more parameters of the process data or examining a frequency response of the process data. The method further includes determining a change in a process based on a change in the process data in the reduced dimension space. The method also includes outputting a result based on the determined change in the process.