Restaurant Incubator System Performance Correlation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

New restaurant operators face significant barriers to entering the market due to high costs and franchise restrictions, as well as difficulties in obtaining necessary funding and resources.

Innovation Solution

A restaurant incubator system utilizing computing devices and server computers to track and analyze performance data of multiple restaurants, providing funding, facilities, and resources in exchange for ownership interest, and enabling cooperative operations to identify and replace underperforming concepts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If new restaurant operators obtain a franchise for an established restaurant, then they can enter the marketplace with a proven concept, but the cost becomes extremely high (hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproven restaurant conceptVSAvoidfinancial cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a restaurant incubator as an intermediary entity between franchisees and established restaurant chains. The incubator provides funding, training, and support to aspiring franchisees, enabling them to obtain franchises without bearing the full financial burden upfront. This intermediary structure resolves the contradiction by decoupling the need for proven concepts from the high cost barrier.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The incubator performs preliminary actions by providing advance funding, training, and operational support to franchisees before they officially open their restaurants. This preliminary support allows new operators to enter the market with proven concepts without immediately facing the full financial burden, effectively resolving the cost-reliability contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If restaurant franchisors grant franchises to inexperienced operators, then more new operators can enter the marketplace, but the risk of failure increases and franchise quality may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccessibility to inexperienced operatorsVSAvoidfranchise success rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The incubator implements a self-service model where inexperienced operators must actively participate in training programs, complete assignments, and demonstrate competency before receiving franchise approval. This self-service approach ensures that even inexperienced operators undergo rigorous preparation, maintaining franchise quality while increasing accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The incubator provides continuous feedback to aspiring franchisees through performance monitoring, training assessments, and operational guidance. This feedback mechanism ensures that inexperienced operators receive real-time corrections and support, thereby maintaining high franchise success rates while allowing greater accessibility to the program.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If inexperienced operators seek funding to open a restaurant with a new concept, then they can pursue innovative ideas, but obtaining necessary funding becomes difficult or impossible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenew restaurant conceptsVSAvoidease of obtaining funding
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The incubator serves multiple functions: it provides funding, training, mentorship, and operational support to aspiring restaurant operators with new concepts. This multi-functional approach resolves the funding accessibility problem by consolidating multiple support mechanisms into a single institution that actively seeks to nurture innovative concepts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The incubator acts as an intermediary between investors and inexperienced operators with new concepts. It evaluates and selects promising concepts, then provides the necessary funding and support, thereby bridging the gap between innovative ideas and available capital without requiring operators to directly secure funding themselves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If the incubator tracks and analyzes performance data of multiple restaurants, then it can identify successful concepts for expansion, but the complexity of data collection and analysis increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification of successful conceptsVSAvoiddata tracking and analysis system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The incubator merges data collection and analysis functions into a centralized system that consolidates performance data from multiple restaurants. By combining these functions rather than treating them separately, the system reduces overall complexity while maintaining the ability to identify successful concepts for expansion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20210158262A1Apparatus supporting restaurant incubation and related methods
Publication Date: 2021.05.27 TRINITY GROVES RESTAURANT INCUBATOR PARTNERS LP
  • US20210158262A1 patent drawing
  • US20210158262A1 patent drawing
  • US20210158262A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus includes at least one memory configured to store information identifying performances of multiple restaurants associated with an incubator project. The apparatus also includes at least one processor configured to correlate the performances of the restaurants over time to identify when one restaurant's performance is dependent upon one or more other restaurants' performances. The at least one processor could be configured to correlate the performances of the restaurants by correlating peak customer visits to the restaurants over time. The at least one processor could also be configured to correlate the peak customer visits to identify whether a specified one of the restaurants is visited more frequently when others of the restaurants are busier.